You can check my posts, I am not a fan of what cops are doing these days by any means. People need to bring them under control. However, the left wing judges who let murderers go free because some cop didn't do it right weren't doing it to protect us, or civil liberties. They were doing it as part of a leftist, decades long effort to destroy the US, one left wing goal at a time. The decisions on the exclusionary rule were wrong. Get rid of it now, however, and you may just see the jackboots go hog wild. The proper response is to pass some very severe laws punishing violations of civil rights by law enforcement, to make sure they are enforced, and provide private rights for those who are harmed. Do that, and the purpose for the exclusionary rule, to deter bad acts by cops, no longer exists. At that point, it becomes a lot easier to deny a murderer freedom just because the cop made a warrantless search that leads him to a dead child.
The rest of your post is nonsense.
We have clear cases of law enforcement exceeding their authority already, in full possession of the fact that their actions will make their case impossible to successfully conclude, and now you actually want to revert to the angels of their better nature to enforce "strict civil rights laws" against ... themselves?
So your contention is that we should reward people who are currently engaged in what is criminal behavior by awarding them with enforcement of those very standards.
Please have some coffee or get some sleep, or something, and come back to post when you're sober.