[Errant]

Eh, I guess you did not understand my post.

Perhaps it's you who didn't understand my question. Allow me to resubmit:

We're talking researching whether the original New Testament texts were Hebrew/Aramaic or Greek. That means someone like Gordon, who would logically have no reason to be bias, would be the perfect candidate.

If you disagree with the above statement, simply explain why...

[Iscool]

We're talking researching whether the original New Testament texts were Hebrew/Aramaic or Greek. That means someone like Gordon, who would logically have no reason to be bias, would be the perfect candidate.

Of course he is biased...He has no leading of the Holy Spirit and he doesn't believe the book you think he ought to research...He has to make the book line up with his personal belief...

[redleghunter]

I disagree for the very same reasons I previously posted. He denies Jesus of Nazareth as Messiah and Lord. That is a bias of the first degree.

[af_vet_1981]

We're talking researching whether the original New Testament texts were Hebrew/Aramaic or Greek. That means someone like Gordon, who would logically have no reason to be bias, would be the perfect candidate.

Unless original Hebrew manuscripts are found to include, we must hold fast the words and tradition delivered to us by the Jewish Apostles. The Spirit of God has given the world sufficient testimony.