Tis the prerogative of Christianity. Any group that denies the trinity is, by definition, a cult, by our own reckoning. Attempting to argue liberal relativism with the Christian world exposes your delusion and stupidity.
I'm not anti-Trinitarian.
If you deny the divinity of Jesus Christ, you are, by definition, anti-trinitarian. Unless you prefer a nicer term? Maybe, NON-Trinitarian? Whatever the case, you deny the fundamentals of Christianity, and therefore the Roodite cult cannot be called Christian. I can certainly see where that idea comes from. I also see the other side of the issue in scripture.
How then do you explain the comment you just wrote to me? Are you willing to argue against the divinity of Christ, or aren't you? You must pick one. You can't expect me to sit here dealing with your heresies, while at the same time you refuse to owe them. Be proud, like your Roodite bretheren, who do not blush to condemn the doctrines of Christianity. I can only speak for myself GPH.
What does that mean? That you, and your Roodite friends, who just happen to all deny the Trinity, aren't representative of Rood's teachings? What is Rood's views on the divinity of Christ? Does he believe Jesus Christ is the one, true, almighty God, second person of the trinity?
You really are becoming a bore GPH. Why don't you and CB find something to fight about, as you both seem to love a good argument. The more moronic the better, while you're looking for something you two can argue about.
>> “Any group that denies the trinity is, by definition, a cult” <<
.
Any man that thinks he can define what is a cult outside of what is written in the word is a complete buffoon unworthy of further discussion!
There is no ‘Trinity’ mentioned or defined in any of the scriptures.
.
>> “If you deny the divinity of Jesus Christ, you are, by definition, anti-trinitarian.” <<
.
Nobody has denied the divinity of Yeshua.
You have nothing but that worn out strawman to beat to death.
.