I can only speak for myself GPH. I don't belong to any 'cult', as you love to use that word in reference to the belief of others who differ with you.
I'm not anti-Trinitarian. I can certainly see where that idea comes from. I also see the other side of the issue in scripture. IMO, there isn't enough to justify a declaration of either as I've told you about 100 times now. You're welcome to show me where the scriptures mention the 'trinity' if you wish.
Again, I'm all about the truth! Putting words in someone's mouth and making false assertions of something said that wasn't said isn't what Yeshua taught. It certainly seems we follow different teachings/spirits.
So tell us the truth. Is there one God, two Gods or what?
Tis the prerogative of Christianity. Any group that denies the trinity is, by definition, a cult, by our own reckoning. Attempting to argue liberal relativism with the Christian world exposes your delusion and stupidity.
I'm not anti-Trinitarian.
If you deny the divinity of Jesus Christ, you are, by definition, anti-trinitarian. Unless you prefer a nicer term? Maybe, NON-Trinitarian? Whatever the case, you deny the fundamentals of Christianity, and therefore the Roodite cult cannot be called Christian. I can certainly see where that idea comes from. I also see the other side of the issue in scripture.
How then do you explain the comment you just wrote to me? Are you willing to argue against the divinity of Christ, or aren't you? You must pick one. You can't expect me to sit here dealing with your heresies, while at the same time you refuse to owe them. Be proud, like your Roodite bretheren, who do not blush to condemn the doctrines of Christianity. I can only speak for myself GPH.
What does that mean? That you, and your Roodite friends, who just happen to all deny the Trinity, aren't representative of Rood's teachings? What is Rood's views on the divinity of Christ? Does he believe Jesus Christ is the one, true, almighty God, second person of the trinity?