Are you trying to tell us that the Greek manuscripts we have today are corrupted and not the inerrant word of God as given by the Holy Spirit?
>> “Are you trying to tell us that the Greek manuscripts we have today are corrupted and not the inerrant word of God as given by the Holy Spirit?” <<
.
Tanach is as given by the Holy Spirit.
There is much argument as to which NT era writings are a part of the word.
Do you hold the “gospel of Thomas?”
Yehova’s word was given in Hebrew, and then translated to other languages. Only the Hebrew original text can be held as fully inspired.
We know from the comments of the early scholars that Matthew’s Hebrew gospel was the foundation from which the other synoptic gospels grew, so they are probably as sound as Matthew’s. Paul’s epistles have been so widely copied, and so many variants exist, that it is necessary to compare their content with the principles of Tanach to establish their reliability. The epistle of James appears to be sound in that respect, as do those of Peter and John.
I know your daddy Diablo isn’t going to like these words, so thereby I see them as affirmed.
.
It becomes blatantly obvious that much was lost in translation from Hebrew to Aramaic and then to Greek, once you actually spend time studying the scriptures, instead of studying the doctrines of man that is.
Greek is the language of Pagans in character and does not have the ability to carry over the original Hebrew meanings. Another reason of the importance to study the root of the message we were given.