Posted on 02/28/2014 7:06:29 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Carl Gallups @ 0:10: I talked with Mike Zullo yesterday and he assures me...that major media is heavily involved...they are involved in this criminal case for certain...and will be released very soon. It was good to get confirmation of the names of the people involved in the media...big, big, big names.
This is going to be huge. So this is not going to go unnoticed. It is not going to go unreported like the last couple of conferences that Sheriff Arpaio did on the birth certificate where major media knew about it and showed up but would not report it. But now they're coming to Arpaio and Zullo. They know what's going on. They know some of it. They know bits and pieces of it and they're chomping at the bit and making their promises and lining up the ducks.
We don't have a date in March but they're still shooting for a late March conference and release of the criminal investigation and information...of the Universe Shattering information. The date of late March is still fluid. Don't panic!...Just hang on.
Now that major media is involved they're gonna want to time it with other events. They're gonna want to do some film footage and some interviews. The hard copy information that they have of this criminal activity that they have traced to the White House continues to pour in...continues to mount and so they're still in this huge investigation process...
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
“Lieutenant” is his name.
And does his arrest report contradict the April 19th, 2008 Washington Times article?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/
Actually, it's Leiutenant, with the e before the i, and has no relation to any rank or official capacity! and so shouldn't get abbreviated as Lt.
Sorry for the “!” thing. Damn iPad.
Hee OK. :-)
" Federal investigators concluded there was sufficient evidence to bring charges against public officials during their years-long abuse-of-power investigation targeting Maricopa County law-enforcement agencies"
Then it all falls apart in the third paragraph as we get this!
"Ultimately, federal prosecutors in August 2012 closed the three-year FBI criminal investigation and grand-jury probe into Sheriff Joe Arpaio, former County Attorney Andrew Thomas and their top deputies, saying there would be no indictments due to a lack of evidence or an insurmountable burden of proof."
What's that psycho term? Oh yes, Cognitive dissonance!
Well, I don’t agree that that’s the best scenario...maybe a likely scenario but definitely not the best.
Ferguson goes birther. ;^)
http://therightscoop.com/hilarious-craig-ferguson-makes-a-few-birther-jokes/
. . . there was a remnant of residue apparently obscuring a couple characters at the beginning of the word "sufficient"; however realizing that the shielded characters were unlikely to shed further light on the matter, they dropped the razor and recorded the sentence as well as they could.
"was in sufficient evidence"
An Obot site pest hogs the comments at that link.
Yeah, Soros/DNC paid smstrauss has got to eat.
That article is incredibly sloppy. For a start, the Harris case wasn’t about passport fraud, it was about credit fraud. It tries to imply a connection between the Obama passport breach and the Harris identity theft ring, when the only connection anyone can point to is that they were the product of sloppy security concerning private contractors and information that’s supposed to be secure.
My money's on (low rent) shill.
Your are correct that the 2008 Washington Times article did jump to the wrong conclusion, and my memory from 5 to 6 years ago failed in that respect.
However, Obama’s current CIA Director John O. Brennen was the contractor and his employees who were responsible for the security breach of the State Department’s Obama passport records:
From TheObamafiles.com that Dr. Con captions as “The Ugly” websites - LoL,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
“Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, headed a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation say that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information. “They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source said. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”
At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
The passport files include “personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,” according to the inspector general report.
The files may contain additional information including “original copies of the associated documents,” the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.
The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.” “
Much more to the story at the link here.
http://www.theobamafile.com/_associates/JohnBrennan.htm.
* pinged Beckwith since it is his website. :-)
I'd say part of a cadre of BOts fanning out across the Internet.
I dunno. The alleged meat of the story—the sinister agenda behind the breaches— comes down to claims from “unnamed sources” and “may have contained.”
From above:
"...and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies."
And
" The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely."
From NewsMax 2009:
The problems posed by the breach were so serious that the inspector general recommended that the State Department conduct “vulnerability and risk assessments of all passport systems” to identify security weaknesses and suggest “a timetable for implementing corrective actions.”
"At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.
[Now his CIA Director how convenient!]
"This individual's actions were taken without the knowledge or direction of anyone at The Analysis Corp. and are wholly inconsistent with our professional and ethical standards," Brennan’s company said in a statement sent to reporters after the passport breach was made public.
http://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/brennan-passport-breach/2009/01/12/id/337482
LoL - I'm sure the OBots "believe" you Brennen.
In general, not removable to federal court. In Obama's case, barred by the statute of limitations, unless some state has a longer statute of limitations than I've ever heard of (typical SOl for felonies other than murder is 5 years).
a continuing fraud is not barred by the statute of limitations neither is one just discovered...
In civil cases, yes. In criminal cases, generally not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.