Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shocked: Mark Levin; Who Is Obama; Frank Marshall Davis Purged; Communist Ties
BirtherReport.com ^ | January 29, 2014 | Mark Levin (audio)

Posted on 01/29/2014 8:14:11 AM PST by Seizethecarp

Professor Paul Kengor joined Mark Levin on his radio show to discuss Obama's relationship with Communist Frank Marshall Davis. Dr. Kengor said Obama is America's first red diaper baby president and says the mainstream media ignores any questions related to Obama's background to which Levin emphatically agreed.

Basically the same thing Levin is guilty of doing in regards to anyone that brings up Obama's background.

It's a great interview to listen to especially for those that don't know about all the radicals that surround Obama...

(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: communist; frankmarshalldavis; jihad; kengor; kgb; levinlive; marklevin; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamacommunist; obamamarxist; patricelumumbaschool; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-186 next last
To: little jeremiah
You're not kidding...the enrollment records for the Obama at Lumumba University would have the young man's full name and his birthday...down in the dusty archives.

Date of birth, January 8, 1961 is what I'm thinking. And the mother's name on his bc will be ANNA (someone)

He would have used the name he used when he taught school in Uganda, according to Malik, who said that Barack Obama did that... and that wasn't the brilliant Harvard graduate. /s

121 posted on 01/31/2014 1:43:56 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Whatever happened to Sven? Was he zotted? He always wrote like he was quite sure of his info — but this is an internet message board, so . . .


122 posted on 01/31/2014 2:09:28 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

http://svenmagnussen.blogspot.com.au/2013/02/complete-index-of-articles-by-sven.html

Last comment posted on FR was January 11. He probably got sick of repeating himself when it became obvious no one was taking any notice. That the boy came back to Hawaii on his own, which is what his basic story was, and why he was issued with an SS number by Catholic Family Services based in CT - has subsequently been shown to be the best explanation - over over and over...imo

He arrived after the name Soebarkah was removed from her passport in 1968, according to the best evidence we have, and when he showed up as BHO2 in Hawaii with nothing to show he was related to the white couple who claimed to be his grandparents, what would one expect the immigration people at the airport to do?

Hand him over?

Shortly after that, the kenyan arrives and the result seems to have been that the Dunhams became his guardians, because at least on paper, the boy appears to have been his son.


123 posted on 01/31/2014 2:31:21 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ecinkc

Your speculation is most welcome, and quite plausible, considering that Trump would love to pay back Barry for humiliating him at the Press Club Diner.


124 posted on 01/31/2014 2:53:57 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

That explanation of the mysterious Christmas visit by Sr. has made the best sense of any I’ve read. They had to prove who he was, but no one in Indonesia would claim him, for whatever reason.

Is there any documentation whatsoever of the child’s name prior to the Christmas visit, other than the Barry Soetoro school record in Indonesia and “Soebarkah”? Might Sr’s odd return have been the first time the boy used the Obama name?


125 posted on 01/31/2014 3:36:28 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
... Might Sr’s odd return have been the first time the boy used the Obama name?

Now there's an interesting, thought provoking question...you'll recall that his kindergarten records have been 'lost' and the kindergarten teacher maintains she wrote the names of the children on the back of the group image, but she didn't show us the back of the photograph, (not that that would have been proof of anything, if his image was added later. So then we have the curious entry at the school in Indonesia, in January 1968 for Grade One as Soetoro.

And later, in August that same year, the name BHO2 Soebarkah is crossed out on a passport amendement.

The first time we see the name Barry Obama seems to be from the period of the photographs supplied on Bartons Blog, I no longer have the URL, I'll see if I can find it again.

126 posted on 01/31/2014 3:48:23 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

For some reason, I am oddly optimistic that this will change.


127 posted on 01/31/2014 3:55:00 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

Here’s what the kindergarten teachers had to say. But neither Scott Inoue or ELeanour Nordyke, both of whose children are shown in that kindergarten class, acknowledged the image...to date, that I know of.

http://www.mauinews.com/page/content.detail/id/513898.html?nav=5074


128 posted on 01/31/2014 3:59:50 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

http://bartongeorge.net/tag/barack-obama/

this blog page has been re-written since the original, which showed a number of images, now there remains just the one, in which his name is shown as Barry Obama.


129 posted on 01/31/2014 4:01:54 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

That’s a 6th grade photo, which would have been after the Christmas visit, if I have my dates right.

I’ve assumed that the birth and childhood narrative always supported the “Barack Obama” name, even if many other details were in question. Now I would like to see something, any credible documentation that the child used that name prior to 1970, something more than a personal recollection from decades ago.


130 posted on 01/31/2014 4:14:29 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

In the old Soviet Union, the citizens tried to read between the lines of Pravda in an effort to determine what was **really** going on.

Speculation about Levin having inside information or maybe Levin’s talking about Davis **might** mean something bigger on the horizon reminds me of Soviet citizens speculating about the truth behind the facade published in Pravda.


131 posted on 01/31/2014 4:47:33 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; Brown Deer; David; Greenperson; little jeremiah; GregNH
You've got me thinking...all over again: let's face it, the first time we see him with Stanley Ann Dunham is when he's about three...and the first time we should have seen his name in print other than the suspect addition to the INS docs, written in a hand that wasn't the kenyan's in APRIL 1964, (and the Wood's Memo on the 31ST OF AUGUST 1961) was that kindergarten story, but we don't see the name there either...and his records have been LOST.

I've always been of the opinion, that if you take away from the INS doc everything the kenyan DID NOT WRITE AND SIGNED OFF ON, he showed himself as married to someone named Ann Obama, and heaven knows who she was.

He was divorced from Stanley Ann Dunham in March 1964, the final decree was dated March 20. It's almost as if there was an adjustment made to that document, to coincide with the fact that she was given sole custody of a child by that name. But was she his mother? Only a forged bc says she was.

Then Anna Obama shows up in Seattle. In the Polk for 1961-1962. So she must have been there in time to be included in the 1961 directory, and Mary says she babysat for Anna Obama in January.

132 posted on 01/31/2014 4:48:33 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; Jedidah; Brown Deer; David; Greenperson; little jeremiah; GregNH

This INS file, along with anything else we find, is just more confusion. Even the memo seems to have two different hands. But that aside.

He can’t provide a BC that would establish US citizenship or we would have seen it by now.

The “memo” mentions that his “wife” is going to attend UW “next” semester, the memo is allegedly written at the end of August but she was allegedly already enrolled by then.

The form states he is married but with a “legal separation”. But he was allegedly divorced by then.

It seems to me that someone discovered a trail for Ann/Anna in Washington and had to try and tie that trail to SAD. Meaning they didn’t get rid of all the evidence of Ann/Anna.

The “memo” also mentions “her” studies as economics and in fact achieving a PHD in economics from a mainland university. I understand plans and majors can change, just saying. Then the “memo” states she will RETURN to Kenya.

We have a Anne identified in a picture with the Kenyan student who appears to be from the Philippines, (this is an assumption) but we also have SAD looking for an emergency passport renewal to go to the Philippines in March of ‘86, we have no record of her actually going there but what would be her need to get there on an urgent basis?


133 posted on 02/01/2014 5:57:56 AM PST by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: GregNH; Greenperson; little jeremiah; Jedidah; Smokin' Joe
Let me try to count the ways:

The “memo” mentions that his “wife” is going to attend UW “next” semester, the memo is allegedly written at the end of August but she was allegedly already enrolled by then.

It seems to me that the Memo has some added information which attempts to answer questions which could be raised by a form bearing the same date:

On which he initially wrote the name of a wife and then crossed it out - the name is now shown as Ann S Dunham, which in person, imo would be the same as Ann S Obama whose name appears in the Polk for Honolulu 1961-1962. This might well have been the student enrolled at the U of HI as Ann S Obama,from the Fall of 1960, it's the first example of how Ann, whose maiden name we do not know, was blended with Stanley Ann, of whom there's no physical evidence of her presence on the island, she first shows up on the island in 1963.

The possible added information on that memo, which would have contained what the INS needed to know, comes after 'plans to return to Kenya'. I think they needed that addition, it's the only thing that ties the file together with the rest of the story...so the question is, when was that crucial detail added?

The first time we hear of Stanley Ann being called Ann and Anna is also a paragraph in 'Dreams' in which there's a lengthy conversation between the Dunham couple, the kenyan and Stanley Ann. It's so obvioulsy contrived to show us that she was called by BOTH Ann and Anna, it's laughable. In the same conversation, her father calls her Ann and the kenyan calls her Anna.

It wasn't until I saw an article out of Kenya from 2004 iirc, in which one of the clan tells the interviewer that the kenyan had gone to the US and married a woman named Anna Toot, that I realized why that paragraph was written. And why they called Madelyn 'Toot' btw. (Not tutu which is some form of endearment used for an elder sister or an aunt, from what I can tell.)

That 'Toot' in the article out of Africa has been the only clue to what that woman's surname might have been.

It's been established that the first semester at the U of WA commenced September 25. The very dubious transcript from the U of WA shows the commencement date as 19 September, the original date assumed by some reports was a mistake due to damage to the copy, it's now been established that the commencement date on the transcript is actually Septmerber 19. Still six days before commencement, but that's the best we could do and there aren't any explanations forthcoming...

Of course the discovery of Anna Obama in the 1961 Polk for Seattle is what Charlette Le Fevre from the Seattle Mystery Museum (bigfoot, UFO's, walking tours of the rich and famous of Seattle) explained is what caused her to telephone the famous baby-sitter in Alaska, who volunteered that yes, she had babysat for Anna when her own daughter, who was born in July 1959, was 18 months of age.

Charlette wrote that up in an article for a Seattle publication as Mary babysat the potus in early 1962, and no one noticed that if you add 18 months to July 1959 you get January 1961.

The transcript was subsequently sent by e-mail to Corsi iirc, and the name was shown as OBAMA Stanley Ann Dunham, including the detail that she was a class of 1960 graduate from Mercer Island. (Something that hasn't been established other than by anecdotes from some devoted 'classmates'.

The form states he is married but with a “legal separation”. But he was allegedly divorced by then.

It would seem that before the information was 'tweaked' to follow the narrative of 'Dreams', Anna Obama, left high and dry in Seattle, after discussing with the Salvation Army the possible adoption of her child in APRIL 1961, may have returned or moved to the Philippines, something he informed the INS of and noted in a subsequent memo.

It seems to me that someone discovered a trail for Ann/Anna in Washington and had to try and tie that trail to SAD. Meaning they didn’t get rid of all the evidence of Ann/Anna.

There are examples of the blending of two women throughout the saga, but that Seattle episode must have created some problems, there was not a hint of Seattle up until then, someone goofed, they must have thought they had dealt with the problem of ANN/ANNA and didn't take into account she might have appeared in the Polk directory as a result of moving into what was basically a boarding house.

When Charlette Le Fevre wrote 'Mary called her Anna, and that's how we knew she was Stanley Ann Dunham' I laughed - she never gave Mary a chance to identify the woman or the child, which btw, Mary never named. Later, when the discrepancies began to show, they adjusted the story to say that Mary didn't babysit until February 1962 and the child was seven months old. But Anna Obama isn't in the Seattle Polk FOR 1962...and so it goes...

We have a Anne identified in a picture with the Kenyan student who appears to be from the Philippines, (this is an assumption) but we also have SAD looking for an emergency passport renewal to go to the Philippines in March of ‘86, we have no record of her actually going there but what would be her need to get there on an urgent basis?

The girl he is shown sitting next to at the Nachmannof's has been identied as a Japanese student. I've forgotten her name at the moment. SAD's emergency trip to the Philippines in 1986 which she then postponed for a month, remains a mystery. As does the identity of ANNA.

Her child, which she most likely named after the father, would seem to have a bio all of his own. It seems he ended up with his father and stepmother Ruth in Kenya, and they called him David.

134 posted on 02/01/2014 1:48:43 PM PST by Fred Nerks (QANS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
Her child, which she most likely named after the father, would seem to have a bio all of his own. It seems he ended up with his father and stepmother Ruth in Kenya, and they called him David.

So if I read this with an open mind I can conclude that the 3 year old who shows up in HI and the 10 year old that shows up in HI are not the same kid? Or if he is the same kid then between Occidental and Harvard there was a switch?

135 posted on 02/01/2014 2:34:26 PM PST by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
No, the two or three year old that shows up in Hawaii with Stanley Ann Dunham and is seen at the beach with her father, is the product of a cuckoo.


136 posted on 02/01/2014 2:52:38 PM PST by Fred Nerks (QANS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

See:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2913366/posts?page=1213#1213


137 posted on 02/01/2014 3:57:06 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Hello, Seizethecrap, up to your old tricks again, I see? Following me around like a bad smell? You don't like to hear about who BHO2 probably really was, do you? That he played with Malik when they were boys, and again, according to Malik, he taught school in Uganda, was seen at the funeral of his father, and entered the Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow thanks to his relative, Oginga Odinga, who picked up a number of scholarships while he was in Moscow, and then sent one of his own sons to attend.

But a man like you, with all of your qualifications, who would swallow that Frank Marshall Davis paid for SAD to travel to Kenya to have a baby, is bound to be rattled by what I have to say.

138 posted on 02/01/2014 4:12:41 PM PST by Fred Nerks (QANS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: GregNH

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3117018/posts?page=90#90

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3117018/posts?page=105#105

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3117018/posts?page=110#110

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3117018/posts?page=112#112

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3117018/posts?page=121#121

And the rest you will have followed after I pinged you. Now, before I get into a slanging match with my old advesary, I’ll call it quits on this thread, he can get quite nasty, and I don’t want to take the risk that this thread will be pulled, because quite often, that’s what happens when he shows up. He’s so intent on following the narrative of ‘Dreams’ that any mention that the white girl from Kansas wasn’t the mother of any boy, sends him into a frenzy.


139 posted on 02/01/2014 4:29:10 PM PST by Fred Nerks (QANS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Interesting thread that, wasn’t it? Shows you up brilliantly for the xxxxxxxxxx you are. Your screed is just one stupid unrelated piece of BS after another. You’ve got information and myth and rumour so beautifully twisted a pretzel would be proud. You really should be working for the other side.

.

You can fill in the xxxxxxxxxxx adjective yourself.


140 posted on 02/01/2014 4:46:39 PM PST by Fred Nerks (QANS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson