Posted on 12/18/2013 8:52:25 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Looks like a love candidate for janet elrenio.
In my short time on this earth I have been through...
Global cooling and the coming of the new ice age that will kill billions of people because of hair spray
We will all die from no ozone layer
Global warming will destroy life on the planet and we’re al gonna die
Then that was upgraded to catastrophic global warming that would kill us all
Then upgraded even further to catastrophic global climate change that will kill us all
Then upgraded even further to catastrophic global climate disruption leading to massive climate refugees and we’re all gonna die.
All these of course require higher taxes, limited liberty, and more government control.
This statement is complete balderdash. I have the Hadley CRU data dumps, it's full of all sorts of damning evidence of fabrication. For example the hockey stick comes from a series of unattributed coefficients in an "R" script, the implicit attribution is an email message discussing ways to make the graph more effective at getting grant money. Also the conspiracy to suppress criticism by engineering the peer reviews is very plain. Also the suppression of hundreds of Siberian tree ring cores to cherry pick one that supports the thesis is documented. Last I heard the original records of historic British temperature data were tossed, there was no independent review, and thus the information is no better evidence than a reconstruction based on ice cores or some other inference. This is one of the reasons why the principals were reluctant to provide source data, because they really couldn't back it up...this is discussed in the first Hadley CRU data dump.
Indeed, this is a one way death agenda, because if cooling would re ever occure, guess what, no coal plant to fire up anymore.
Secondly a green house full of CO2 never changed temperature if filled woth O2. The real heat exchange occurs with water condensation with far more energy. A minute temperature increase is immediately offset by the vast Oceans’ rising water vapor recondenscing and loosing heat to outer space. It is a natural control mechanism much like the presure release valve or a steam speed controller.
Answer, "Why, yes! I believe in it just as much as acid rain. OH, Look! That cloud looks like it's falling!"
This is all about the definition of pollution. This is why Climate Changists belong to the church of Satan.
Pollution in the Bible is wasted semen, liberal life back stabbing abortions and liberal lifestyles. Life is not pollution. Without a good person the Earth is just a blob of purposeless pollutants. They are trying to blame us for their useless parasitic lives, passing the buck.
I stopped reading at ‘Salon’...
I firmly believe in climate change. Who doesn’t? It changes all the time. The fools who believe that humans are to blame for it changing need to be smacked down.
1. why after 30 years of your news media and government scientists screaming global warming ,why has it not got warmer? This year is the coldest i remember. after 30 years of “global warming “ where is the warming?
1. after 300 years of increasing industrialization there has been no warming , no sea level rise(from melting of ice in Antarctica.
2. the sun's solar cycles are quieting which means decades of coming global cooling . this year is the coldest i remember and it;s just the beginning
As it gets colder in the next few years ,it will be fun going on sites all over the internet and pointing it out to news media reporters and other democrats that it is getting colder not warmer.idiot democrats
to liberals/democrats a gas CO2 that is 0.0003 of the atmosphere is more powerful that the Sun in which a million Earths could fit into. i was having a debate with a democrat about global warming. and she actually thought the Sun revolved around the Earth
the reason that gas co2 is demonized is because by demonizing it they can destroy capitalism advance socialism
On a more mundane level, the conceit, so we are told, is that CO2 from fossil fuels is changing the global concentration of the gas - and it is posited that that will cause climate disruption. Suppose that to be true. How do we ameliorate that? It will not suffice to shut down a few - or all - US coal-fired power plants if the US is not the primary user of coal-fired electric power. And it is not - that would be China, which is building dozens of new coal-fired plants as I type. India is also a big, and getting bigger, consumer of coal. And, nuclear power emits no CO2 at all.The obvious conclusion, if indeed CO2 emission is a problem, is that we must convince China to stop using coal, and that China and everyone else should switch to nuclear power. None of which has any appeal at all to the environmentalist who is actually merely favors alternative (read, expensive and unreliable) energy precisely because it is expensive and unreliable. It is a misanthropic perspective.
Scientific American is neigher scientific, nor American.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.