I understand that the ‘innocent until’ applies to the legal system only, and I fully anticipated you would say this…..but this doesn’t change the fact that you have convicted him and you are too obtuse, stupid, ignorant, or have such poor reading comprehension that you have never ever ever ever answered my last scenario…because YOU CANNOT. YOU HAVE CONVICTED him of something in your tiny mind……
And again, the Heisman is NOT a civic award. And it CAN be redacted. But I fully am calling total bullsh-t on the fact that you would, in the same situation, turn down this award. BS BS BS BS BS BS.
You are just like a liberal….giving away other people’s award like they give away other peoples money…..all because you have a better understanding of who should get the award than the very committee themselves.
but again….answer the cleat chaser scenario, or you have zero standing here .
I have no authority whatsoever to convict anybody of anything. The notion that you think I do, really demonstrates who the obtuse one is (hint: it isn't me).
I've formed judgments and opinions, certainly, and they are formulated strictly on the standards I would fully expect to apply to myself, and to have others apply to me were I in Winston's cleats. Apparently I hold (or more correctly, "held") the Heisman in higher esteem and regard than its own voting body and its most recent recipient. Holding high standards can be a bitch sometimes, especially when you have to defend them to people who are either incapable of, or merely too lazy to understand them.
The Heisman standards include the words, "integrity and excellence." Clearly Winston is your gold standard for what passes for integrity and excellence; hope you can live up to it. Personally, I'm going to aim a little bit higher.
Please stop.