1 posted on
11/18/2013 11:36:19 AM PST by
Skeez
To: Skeez
that was before 9/11. that would change anyone.
2 posted on
11/18/2013 11:37:42 AM PST by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: Skeez
He was always into nation destruction.
That’s the result of open borders with an enemy nation that has 30 or 40 million colonizers to spare.
He had no problem letting them in.
3 posted on
11/18/2013 11:39:48 AM PST by
Regulator
To: Skeez
Pat Buchanan writes about something like this in his books and of course, I agree with Pat.
4 posted on
11/18/2013 11:41:31 AM PST by
BeadCounter
(The night they drove O'BamaCare down...)
To: Skeez
Pres. Bush didn't send troops in just to nation-build like Clinton did.
Pres. Bush sent troops in for national security reasons.
5 posted on
11/18/2013 11:42:49 AM PST by
what's up
To: Skeez
That he got stuck with doing it doesn’t mean he thought it was a good thing. It was the least crappy of many crappy alternatives. I didn’t like it either.
8 posted on
11/18/2013 11:49:32 AM PST by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
To: Skeez
That guy would have been a great president.
12 posted on
11/18/2013 12:01:38 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: Skeez
Yes, he could have been a much president had he not gotten bogged down in the feckless task of “nation building”.
15 posted on
11/18/2013 12:49:50 PM PST by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededicaton to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution...)
To: Skeez
I remember, Not the last time either.
a long painful episode.
22 posted on
11/18/2013 1:45:45 PM PST by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson