After receiving Onaka’s letters both Bennett and Kobach said that they were now satisfied that the questions they had about Obama’s birthplace had been answered and they cleared Obama for the ballot in states that Romney won by landslides. That’s the bottom line.
Nobody threatened Kobach’s or Bennett’s families and they were the ones who issued the statements to the press, not the person who filed the Kansas objection and then withdrew it.
Yeah, the threats to the objector were not a warning shot to Kobach at all...
And Bennett saying in advance that he was going to put Obama’s name on the ballot as long as Hawaii sent him ANYTHING doesn’t speak to his integrity either...
I have a bridge to sell you and I’m sure you’ll buy it too.
Meanwhile, all you Obots ignore the questions I’ve asked. Specifically, is it legally OK for a public official to ask a question directly in a legal request and then assume that the answer given under oath was wrong even though there is no evidence of that and clarification was never asked? Can officials simply set aside the presumption of regularity whenever it is convenient for them? Are we governed by laws or by the wishful thinking of public officials?
I believe I know your answer but it would be good for you to hear it coming from your own mouth so you can realize your own lawlessness.
Bennett made a decision without reading the letter of verifcation. Kobach's statement was made in front of a hostile crowd.