Onaka never verified the truth of any fact about Obama’s birth. Show me any place where Onaka clearly and specifically says HE VERIFIES that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961, in Honolulu on the island of Oahu, to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama.
Bennett knew that Aug 4, 1961 at the very least was never verified. He assumed it was a mistake. I asked you whether that is an OK way to do legal business here in the USA. You wouldn’t answer so I’ll ask again. When a witness (to whether the claim is made on a valid record) gives an answer under oath, is it legally acceptable for a public official to assume they meant something else, without any evidence or clarification?
I’ll add this: You speak and think like a Fogblower. You blew off Janice Okubo’s legal responses to me and assumed that I made up stories. Those who know me can tell you that I don’t make up stories. Just as the worker stated to my colleague, Hawaii has never issued a verification of Obama’s birth facts. They issued a verification of the existence of a birth record, and they certified it in a way that violated Hawaii statute. They used a form that Janice Okubo, in a legal/formal communication, told me doesn’t exist. No problem, huh?
The certified Letters of Verification from Hawaii served their intended purpose.
“Hawaii sends Arizona Verification of Obama’s Birth:”
http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/2012/05/22/20120522obama-birth-hawaii-arizona-verification.html?nclick_check=1
“I have no doubts now, Kobach says, of Obama’s birthplace:”
http://www.kansas.com/2012/09/17/2492998/kansas-expects-to-end-challenge.html