Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2013 1:06:52 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldpuppymax

They will either side with the secy of state in Alabama OR they will say that the claimaints lack standing


2 posted on 09/22/2013 1:16:22 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

“What difference, at this point, does it make?”


3 posted on 09/22/2013 1:16:23 PM PDT by Old Sarge (Opinions are like orgasms: only mine count, and I couldn't care less if you have one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

FEDeral court will shoot that down.

The SC of Alabama has no standing to rule on the issue. Obama never lived in Alabama when he became old enough to register, to my knowledge.

This is an effort in futility by whomever brought the case.


4 posted on 09/22/2013 1:18:14 PM PDT by TomGuy (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

Ok. So we finally get the answer as to whether the Secretary of State should have vetted the candidates. And then we’ll know if either or both Obama and Romney should have appeared on the Alabama ballot. And we can wait for the exciting news that Obama lost all 0 of the Alabama electoral votes he received. Which changes the national election by nothing.

Sorry... not holding my breath.

By the way, Alabama has been sitting on this for months. Whatever gave you the idea that they are any closer to a decision at this point???


6 posted on 09/22/2013 1:22:12 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

Don’t hold your breath.


8 posted on 09/22/2013 1:26:20 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

That article cries out for a good edit.


9 posted on 09/22/2013 1:26:21 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

He’s a homosexual. He’s a Marxist. He’s a Muslim. He’s a liar. He’s a fraud. He’s a criminal. He’s committed treason. He’s a murderer. A draft dodger? Who knows.......


12 posted on 09/22/2013 1:29:42 PM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax
Alabama Supreme Court to rule on Obama’s failure to register with Selective Service

If he really thinks that then Coach is going to be disappointed.

14 posted on 09/22/2013 1:40:20 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

I can guaran-damn-tee you that if George W Bush were required under the law to register for Selective Service and did not do it, the media would have been investigating him for 8 straight years.

Imagine if it is discovered:
Ted Cruz
Rand Paul
Marco Rubio
or any upcoming conservative politician, required to register, had not done so, how deep the anal probe the media would be on their career...cries of “special treatment” and “privileged class” would be screamed nightly from Brian Williams, Scott Pelley and Charles Gibson....and Chuck Schumer would be shoving down old ladies in the rush to get in front of a tv camera to express his hatred for the “Republican hypocrites”....

But hey, Obamugabe hasn’t registered with the Selective Service?

No one in the media cares.


18 posted on 09/22/2013 1:52:19 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

This Alabama eligibility challenge is unique in that the plaintiffs are Republicans, the defendant is also a Republican and every member of the Alabama Supreme Court is a Republican. Barack Obama is not a party to this civil action.
The only input from Democrats in this appeal is an amicus brief submitted by the Alabama Democratic Party in support of the defendant, the Republican Secretary of State of Alabama.
However if the plaintiffs should prevail, the upside is that the Secretary of State in Alabama would then have to verify Obama’s eligibility but the downside is that Mitt Romney already won Alabama’s electoral votes.
To directly impact Obama, this process would need to be replicated in states that gave their electoral votes to Obama’s 332 electors total to take him down below the 270 elector threshold that is needed for election.


40 posted on 09/22/2013 8:37:49 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax
Dated, and I don't know the current situation, but it caught my eye.

Obama’s Selective Service card forwarded to USPIS Mail Fraud Division

85 posted on 09/24/2013 10:41:50 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

It’s Friday. Any decision?


135 posted on 09/27/2013 1:18:16 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

I wonder if this has anything to do with McInnish v Chapman, case 1120465, Alabama Supreme court? or just off to pastures new.

http://www.wset.com/story/22734500/gov-bentley-comments-on-beth-chapmans-resignation

the new SOS for Alabama:-

http://www.sos.state.al.us/


152 posted on 09/30/2013 5:34:21 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

Ok... there was no decision last Friday. Once again it is Friday. Is today the day we get a decision?


166 posted on 10/04/2013 1:40:56 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson