Posted on 08/19/2013 9:07:35 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
It has taken the global left nearly 2 decades to usher the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) through the friendly confines of the United Nations. Offered for signature in its final form in June, the Treaty which purports to “establish common international standards for regulating the trade in conventional arms,” really is as dangerous to the right of Americans to keep and bear arms as 2nd Amendment supporters have claimed since the Obama Regime–specifically, Hillary Clinton–began the push for the Treaty’s eventual ratification several years ago. (1)
The ATT was deliberately written in broad, general terms throughout most of its text. In this way, the Treaty can generously “reaffirm the sovereign right of any State to regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system.” (1) Of course this language from the Preamble mentions nothing about keeping or bearing arms, just regulation and control.
And to effectively manage that process of regulation and control, the Treaty “…require[s] that states “establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list” and “designate competent national authorities in order to...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
He will leave illeqal guns in the hands of violent criminals, while trying to take them away from honest, non-violent citizens.
This holds true under 3 conditions
1) The Senate ratifies the treaty, or
2) King obama tries to implement it w/o Senate ratification, and
3) The people of the United States stand idly by as conditions 1 or 2 happen.
Bring It!
Blue helmets, the other red meat.
Take heed those in the NSA reading this. You are NOT anonymous, and neither is your families' locations.
Same with the drone operators...
5.56mm
The crux of the matter.
This holds true under 4 conditions
1) The Senate ratifies the treaty, or
2) King obama tries to implement it w/o Senate ratification, and
3) The people of the United States stand idly by as conditions 1 or 2 happen.
4) There is a chinese restaurant at 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. but they do not do take-out.
He is not a king, so refrain from using it. If I wanted to read propaganda, I wouldn’t be a FR.
I'll use what ever descriptor I wish, and at this point, I wish to use "King obama" in reference to the fact that his actions show, almost daily now, that he feels that he and his agenda are above the law and is unaccountable to the US people.
Thank you for your opinion, though.
To accomplish this Obama would have to use heavily armed goon squads to take guns from the hands of legal owners. I do not believe the gun owners or the American public at large would tolerate such Gestapo tactics without rebelling.
Civil War will come again to America if he tries it. WE ARE FED UP WITH OUR CONSTITUTION BEING CRAPPED ON BY A FAGOT KENYAN MARXIST MUSLIM TRAITOR!
LLS
Nope. Senate already struck it down 56-43-1
Nope. Senate already struck it down 56-43-1
i am also tired of it being crapped on by liberal politicians and RINOs, and Republican opportunists who just talk big about the problems to get elected but never seem to fix them and do the hard work and take the arrows, once in office.
5.56mm
5.56mm
Bring a rope to a gun fight. Bring it.
Actually it is used as an insult against Obama. One I fully agree with. He should be called it more often to the point it enters the mainstream.
You’re welcome!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.