Only a judge can determine that. So far no one has brought it up in court.
Not that any of this has any likelihood of happening but IMO here’s how it would go.
The plaintiff contend BC is invalid.
The defense provides the certified verification.
The plaintiffs contest it with your theory
Judge decides if your theory is valid.
Baloney. Orly brought it up in court; that’s what this suit is about - whether there is a legally valid BC in HI, of which the White House image is a true and accurate representation.
Tepper has produced a document which would say the same thing whether the HDOH record is valid or non-valid. It thus has no value to the question of whether there is a legally-valid BC at the HDOH.
IOW, Tepper is firing blanks in response to Orly’s evidence of forgery. What attorney would want to fire blanks in a court of law when he could have had a slam dunk just by asking for it?