Practically speaking you may be right. Congress needs to get involved. But any judge worth his salt should know that Onaka did not verify that any of that information is claimed on a legally-valid record. The judge has no way of knowing whether the HI record is legally valid, or is a piece of toilet paper with a scratching on it.
And any judge who knows anything about the documented crimes by the HDOH should allow discovery so that the claims of the HDOH can be cross-examined.
“But any judge worth his salt should know that Onaka did not verify that any of that information is claimed on a legally-valid record.”
You and I will have to agree to disagree on this, it seems. IMO, you are speculating based on inferences and your personal interpretation of HI statutes. I doubt that any judge in the US, state or federal, would fail to honor the Onaka “Verification.”
The seal and signature stamp make the verification prima facie “self-authenticating” meaning that a separate evidentiary hearing would need to be held to challenge it, IIRC.
No credible evidence (evidence, not speculation or inference) that Onaka’s verification was forged or that it was NOT a verification, as claimed on the face of the document, has been presented to any court by a competent attorney representing a plaintiff with standing.