This also has a stamp and a seal, and so it’s self-authenticating evidence that Barack Obama was also born in Kenya.
“What has happened is a carefully orchestrated sleight of hand where incomplete information has been presented...”
__
Well, it’s certainly an entertaining set of hypotheticals, but I think you’re making it more complicated than it needs to be.
One of the letters, for example, says: “Pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues §338-14.3, I verify the following: // 1: A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.”
It’s got a stamp and a seal, and so it’s self-authenticating evidence that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. The only remaining question is whether you can somehow invalidate the document or the information by making a contrary showing in court. Until you do, the document is presumed to be authentic and the information is presumed to be correct.
Only real documents have stamps and seals.
Digital files - no so much.
They are just 1s and 0s.
Hypothetical? You jest!
Suggest you brush up before further comments.
That document has not been presented in any court, and the recipient of that document only allowed Obama on the ballot because he ASSUMED that the document was incorrect, as he told a Freeper who asked him why the date of birth - a critical piece of information - was not verified.
The MDEC attorney could have asked the same stuff as Bennett asked and gotten the same response. Why do you suppose he wouldn’t do that? If what is on that LOV that you mentioned has any value to the discussion, then why didn’t the MDEC attorney get his own LOV saying the same thing, and present it in court? Instead, he’s got a document that says nothing even remotely relevant to the issue at hand in his case: whether the claims on the White House BC are made on a LEGALLY VALID record at the HDOH. He could have had it all and instead he chose to have nothing. Why is that? Is he stupid, or what?