Wait, explain that to me. If the BC is perjurious, then isn’t the LoV perjurious too? I’m not following your logic.
And why do you think the documents are marked “late” or “amended” when none of the images we’ve seen depict them that way?
Because items are verified to "match", which is meaningless. (it is incomplete, items such as amendments are concealed). It is lying by omission, a dodge.
And why do you think the documents are marked “late” or “amended” when none of the images we’ve seen depict them that way?
Have you missed the innumerable discussions regarding image anomalies?
The letter of verifications don’t actually make any legal claims except that they have a BC for Obama which makes certain claims. That’s not perjurious; they do have a non-valid BC that makes those claims.
But just in case somebody might argue that Onaka DID actually verify the truth of some birth facts, Onaka made sure that initials were placed next to his signature stamp (thus evading personal responsibility for the signature) and that his own raised seal to authenticate his signature was not used.
Even Bennett knows Onaka did not verify the birth facts. He told a Freeper that the birth date was not on the letter of verification because Onaka had made a mistake. IOW, he understood that Onaka couldn’t verify a fact without actually stating that he was verifying the fact. And Onaka never stated that ANY fact was true, and only even MENTIONED Honolulu, out of all 6 birth facts Bennett submitted to be verified as true. So Bennett assumed that Onaka messed up 6 facts but got one right on that verification. He assumed that Onaka got a 17% on that simple open-book exam, and that such a grade was good enough for Bennett...