Interesting tidbit at #105
You said, “If someone sends in a request for a verification and they only include two facts on the request form - they would get a letter verifying that a vital record - birth - exists for that person. That would verify the two facts but nothing else.”
Then why did the HDOH feel the need to explain that the letter of verification could not verify other, unsubmitted facts?
The official HDOH seal is specifically defined in statute, and it is stated that it SHALL be embossed next to the director’s signature. If not embossed it can be used on other stuff but when it is embossed it is to be next to the director’s signature, according to the statute (Title 11-1-2, found at http://hawaii.gov/health/about/rules/index.html/prac_proc.pdf ).
The director’s seal differs from Onaka’s seal in two ways: it is bigger, and it has a star separating the words in the top bank of the circumference from the bottom words. I have seen photographs of the seal on the Bennett verification with a ruler beside it for comparison, which my friend Tom Ballantyne took in person for me. It is the director’s seal. So we’ve got Onaka’s signature but not Onaka’s seal, and Fuddy’s seal but not Fuddy’s signature. To fulfill Congress’ codification of the Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause it has to have the legally-authorized signature and seal. Instead, these verifications have mismatched signatures and seals. None of these “verifications” are lawfully certified.
Pinging you guys to some information that is in my Part Six. I’m sort of in limbo on posting that part because of law enforcement and strategy issues, but this part of it I’m OK to reveal. Post 98 also contains some information related to this.
Interesting tidbit at #105
The truth will come out. Someone in HDOH will brag about what they did after Obama leaves office.
The whole thing is disgusting. I was a Democrat at one time. I now view that party as I would view the Nazi party. Absolutely disgusting and amoral.