“An exact replica of the whitehouse.gov PDF with anomalies has been produced using the standard profile for scanning a document and emailing it on a Xerox WorkCentre 7655, then opening the PDF in Preview, rotating it 180 degrees and then saving to PDF. This workflow results in “anomalies” that are identical (not merely approximate) to the whitehouse.gov posted PDF:”
1. Initial scan of 600 DPI
2. Separation into a jpeg background and multiple monochrome foregrounds
3. Alignment of two boundaries with 8×8 bit offsets
4. Alignment of two boundaries with internal object
5. Downsampling the background to 150 DPI
6. Downsampling the foregrounds to 300 DPI
7. Saving the JPEG with a quality factor of 47.48% with specific Quantization Matrix
8. Embedding a YCbCr comment into the generated JPEG
9. Original JBIG2 compression (by Xerox)
10. Images are all in landscape direction
11. PDF version is changed (by Preview) from 1.x to 1.3
12. JBIG2 objects are now encoded as FlateDecode monochrome bitmaps
13. ObjStm objects are decomposed into multiple XObjects
14. /Rotate tag is replaced with cm level rotations
15. Metadata shows Preview creator/producer information
16. A clipping mask is added
The above is other people’s work, not mine. I am just posting it here for discussion purposes among folks who know a whole lot more about computer software than I do.
The above might become significant if there were ever to be a formal (beyond a volunteer non-profit organization posse which is adjunct to the statutory law enforcement agency) law enforcement investigation of forgery or if a grand jury were to look into the alleged crime.
“An exact replica of the whitehouse.gov PDF with anomalies has been produced using the standard profile for scanning a document and emailing it on a Xerox WorkCentre 7655, then opening the PDF in Preview, rotating it 180 degrees and then saving to PDF. This workflow results in “anomalies” that are identical (not merely approximate) to the whitehouse.gov posted PDF:”
The source of the above quote appears to be here:
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/07/27/hermitian-forgery/
I would like to see rebuttal from the Cold Case Posse investigators who claim that the BC can’t be replicated in a scan...
Even if those steps would create these digital results - and I strongly question whether they would be able to make only the certifying elements moveable, for instance - why would anybody take those steps? Why not just scan the document as-is, saving it as a jpeg, and then upload that jpeg to a website? And then why not let people handle the real 3D document on video so everybody can see?
And it’s not just digital anomalies that are a problem. For instance, a computer program does not center all the supposedly-manually-typed items.
A computer program does not change the cross-hatch pattern to one that the HDOH doesn’t use.
A computer program does not combine methods from 2 different eras, as bluecat6 mentioned.
And a computer program would not be able to get the HI state registrar to refuse to verify for Ken Bennett the actual facts of Obama’s birth, which is legally required of him if the White House BC is a scan of the actual document at the HDOH.
But I’m wondering if the folks at Fogbow have or have been fed some insider information from those who desperately need some kind of explanation for how the White House image is even plausible...