“””””When someone makes dozens of bullsh*t claims IN A ROW, without even ONE such claim holding up to examination, what are the odds that their next claim to “prove” the same thing is going to be anything other than bullsh*t?.....”””
“”””...Except for stuff that can be and has been explained by compression of the image, the PDF looks just like the photos of the paper document.
“”””
Multiple document experts have examined at the 9 Layer issue and concluded that it could not possibly appear that way as a result of compression. No one has challenged them since. Yet, you cling to that false explanation as though it is the truth. Why?
You Also just dismiss the many month careful through investigation by Sheriff Arpaio. AND also every point we make even when your so obviously wrong.... This is why we say you are intellectually dishonest. People here are angry with you because You compose long winded posts are like a what an attorney does when they are trying to confuse a jury as they represent a guilty client. I for one do not want you banned..... I am willing to test my conclusions against any opposition .... including yours.
Because all of the "evidence" presented by those so-called "document experts" has been shown to be bullshit.
A conservative author and computer consultant wrote an entire book on the forgery stuff. If you haven't read it, you should. I've read it. It holds up, and it shows that all the so-called "experts" who said the PDF was a forgery well full of crap.
You Also just dismiss the many month careful through investigation by Sheriff Arpaio.
Woodman debunked almost everything they said, before they even said it.
Woodman's evaluation was also backed up by one of the world's top REAL experts in PDF image compression, who pretty much invented the technology, Ricardo de Queiroz.
AND also every point we make even when your so obviously wrong.... This is why we say you are intellectually dishonest.
I don't think you can name a single point on which I'm "obviously wrong." I've presented very good evidence to back up every single point I've made.
People here are angry with you because You compose long winded posts are like a what an attorney does when they are trying to confuse a jury as they represent a guilty client. I for one do not want you banned..... I am willing to test my conclusions against any opposition .... including yours.
Then I invite you to do so. You can start with the long list of quotes I just posted from our Founding Fathers, their close associates, and our best early legal experts.
Check out every fact. Let me know if you find a single one that isn't true. If you do, and provide real proof, then I will correct it.