Because all of the "evidence" presented by those so-called "document experts" has been shown to be bullshit.
A conservative author and computer consultant wrote an entire book on the forgery stuff. If you haven't read it, you should. I've read it. It holds up, and it shows that all the so-called "experts" who said the PDF was a forgery well full of crap.
You Also just dismiss the many month careful through investigation by Sheriff Arpaio.
Woodman debunked almost everything they said, before they even said it.
Woodman's evaluation was also backed up by one of the world's top REAL experts in PDF image compression, who pretty much invented the technology, Ricardo de Queiroz.
AND also every point we make even when your so obviously wrong.... This is why we say you are intellectually dishonest.
I don't think you can name a single point on which I'm "obviously wrong." I've presented very good evidence to back up every single point I've made.
People here are angry with you because You compose long winded posts are like a what an attorney does when they are trying to confuse a jury as they represent a guilty client. I for one do not want you banned..... I am willing to test my conclusions against any opposition .... including yours.
Then I invite you to do so. You can start with the long list of quotes I just posted from our Founding Fathers, their close associates, and our best early legal experts.
Check out every fact. Let me know if you find a single one that isn't true. If you do, and provide real proof, then I will correct it.
Unlike you, I am more than willing to be wrong as long as the whole truth is told. I maintain that the whole truth is being kept secret. Why can’t we examine so many documents? Why are they kept hidden? We can not even look at the Hospital records, college funding, Passport history and others. All this would confirm if you are correct.
Does Sheriff Arpaio with his long history of law enforcement service have a reputation of manipulating investigations? NO!!!! Now, all of a sudden, at 81 years old he becomes a political hack for the right??? Doesn’t seem plausible to me.
If Woodman’s conclusions that the PDF file is a true and accurate copy of an original document, why would the investigation ignore those findings. According to the ccp they did not ignore Woodmans findings but rather tried multiple times to replicate it without success...... There is so much smoke here.... There is a fire somewhere.
“Because all of the “evidence” presented by those so-called “document experts” has been shown to be bullshit.”
A blogger may have determined the way the White House LFBC PDF was created.
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/the-proof-forgery-done-by-xerox-workcentre-7655/
The blogger (NBC) printed a copy of the White House LFBC PDF and then scanned the paper copy back into the computer using a Xerox WorkCentre 7655 scanner.
The resulting scan had five layers which are very similar to the White House LFBC PDF’s layers.
The Xerox 7655’s software uses Mixed Raster Content (MRC) compression to reduce the file size. From the Xerox brochure for the 7655 under scanning features,
New scan to export compression formats:
• MRC (multi-layer)
• JBIG2
The White House used a Xerox WorkCentre 7655 to upload Obama’s and Biden’s 2010 taxes.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/POTUS_taxes.pdf
Unfortunately, the blogger has not posted a copy of the PDF, instead the blogger seems to be challenging the Cold Case Posse to try it and see if they get different results.
But someone else did the same thing with the White House PDF but used a Xerox WorkCentre 7535. That person got a PDF with 17 layers (similar in appearance to the White house PDF’s).
http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/wh-lfbc-scanned-xerox-7535-wc.pdf
The Xerox WorkCentre 7535 also uses MRC compression.