[Louis Foxwell]

Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List (notification of new articles).

FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Sultan Knish ping list.

I strongly suggest you visit the Knish blog. It is a fountain of valuable links, articles and more.

[Louis Foxwell]

But, of course, the entrepreneur DID build his invention, frequently with opposition from neighbors, industry and, especially, government.
The child king is wrong, as usual. He does not so much need to be thrown out as taught a lesson. This nation is about personal freedom and the dignity of individual effort, not mass hysteria and lining up to get a handout.

[MestaMachine]

How anout we build some guts? How about we create a backnone? How about we stop allowing ourselves to be walked over and our dreams to be shattered by those who would steal for themselves what we have spent over two hundred years building already?

[Ray76]

Outstanding post.

[No One Special]

…the myth of socialism is far stronger than the reality of capitalism. That is because capitalism is not really an ism at all. It is what people do if you leave them alone.

–Arnold Beichmen

[MV=PY]

Thanks for the ping. Mr. Greenfield nails it again.

This one’s a keeper.

[left that other site]

As an artist, I find it VERY disturbing that the biggest shills for communism are ofter those who are successful in their field of creative endeavor.

The Rock Stars, Actors, Architects, Movie Producers, and Visual Artists will be the FIRST to be subjugated and oppressed, and used to create propaganda for the State in a communist regime.

The list is endless of artists co-opted into the propaganda machine. A few examples would be Prokofiev, Shostakovitch, Filmmaker Sergei Eisenstein, and all the thousands of sculptors and architects whose creativity was buried under huge, massive, ugly, statues of Lenin and Stalin.

For a laugh, just google “Bad Communist art”.

[GOPJ]

The Soviet Union, China, North Korea and Vietnam all won their engagements with enemies in the same way; by throwing so many men at the problem that the enemy would become bogged down and eventually forced to retreat. Their military victories did not emerge from strategy or heroism, but the mechanical willingness to sacrifice numberless individuals for the goals of the collective.

Interesting..