I remember people moving the goalposts repeatedly on what constitutes proof of WMD.
So when the Sarin IED shell showed up, they went into overdrive trying to excuse it, ignore it, or claim Sarin is not a WMD.
So here we are years later with teh left -the same guys who claimed Sarin was not a WMD years ack- and they want to now claim that it is.
It is apparently too much to ask for consistency.
As for the kid, who knows.
I wouldn’t put it past old poster “JohnGalt” to try and come back to play his old games.
yea moving the goal posts is a good way of putting it, now WMD’s are pressure cookers to the left and yet Sarin was not.
The left just change the rules for what they need the rules to be when it suits them, this is what is happening here
Even if they had WMD and were on the verge of having Nukes I wouldnt support invading them.
Robert Taft never supported entry into WW2 until Pearl Harbor in 1941.
That’s when a response is justified; Iraq never attacked the US.
[[I remember people moving the goalposts repeatedly on what constitutes proof of WMD.]]
Another typical leftist strategy- and let’s not forget, they always say “Just show us soem ‘real proof’ and we’ll be the first ones to admit we were wrong’ - but of course EVERY TIME REAL evidence is presented, they poo poo it and move the goal post even frurther out- just like they are doign with hte terrorist bombers- even askign whether it was actual terrorism, or if it was just somke ‘confused impressionable kids makign a political statement’ and htese leftist scum even go so far as to blame the victims instead of the terrorists- just like our dear leader did for several weeks- blaming AN AMERICAN for makign a youtube video and ‘startign the ‘uprising’ (He wouldn’t even call it an acto fo terrorism)
To the left, there is no such thing as an absolute (as wtienssed by their continual attacks on Christianities morality values and absolute universal moral code- and upon our very constitution-