Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AR:Constitutional Carry will be the Law in Arkansas
Gun Watch ^ | 25 April, 2013 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 04/24/2013 6:44:19 PM PDT by marktwain

On 4 April, 2013, Arkansas HB1700 became ACT 746. The revised law will not go into effect until late July or early August of this year.

The bill makes a definition change in the statute that has been interpreted to limit the legal carrying of weapons in Arkansas.

The original language was this:

A person commits the offense of carrying a weapon if he or she possesses a handgun, knife, or club on or about his or her person, in a vehicle occupied by him or her, or otherwise readily available for use with a purpose to employ the handgun, knife, or club as a weapon against a person.

The new language is this. Bold added to make the change stand out:

SECTION 2.

5-73-120.

Carrying a weapon.

(a) Arkansas Code § 5-73-120 is amended to read as follows: A person commits the offense of carrying a weapon if he or she possesses a handgun, knife, or club on or about his or her person, in a vehicle occupied by him or her, or otherwise readily available for use with a purpose to attempt to unlawfully employ the handgun, knife, or club as a weapon against a person.

This change clarifies the meaning of the law to what was likely the original intent; that a person may not carry a weapon with the intent of using it for unlawful purposes. There does not appear to be other Arkansas law that forbids the carrying of weapons (except in certain named locations). Therefore it appears that Arkansas will have Constitutional carry.

The law also clarifies the meaning of "journey". The previous law made an exception for the carry of weapons during a journey. Journey is now clarified to mean travel that crosses a county boundary. Arkansas has many counties of roughly the same size , about 25 to 30 miles on a side. This means that a great deal of travel will fall into the legal category of a journey. In addition the law exempts carry on your own property or property that you have an interest in.

The law is available in PDF format Here

Map showing Arkansas Counties

There may be legal challanges before the law is accepted by all legal entities in Arkansas.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: ar; arkansas; banglist; constitutionalcarry; guncontrol; opencarry; secondamendment
Arkansas is likely to become the 5th state with Constitutional Carry.
1 posted on 04/24/2013 6:44:19 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain; All

Sorry that the link goes to a preview page instead of the article.

Here is the real link to the article:

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/04/arconstitutional-carry-will-be-law-in.html


2 posted on 04/24/2013 7:06:52 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Here is the link to the PDF file:

http://legiscan.com/AR/bill/HB1700/2013


3 posted on 04/24/2013 7:11:31 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Can you clarify what the “percent change” is represented by the map?


4 posted on 04/24/2013 7:12:51 PM PDT by To Hell With Poverty (Ephesians 6:12 becomes more real to me with each news cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: To Hell With Poverty

Yes, the map is a graphic to show the shape of the counties. The percent change is in population.


5 posted on 04/24/2013 7:22:16 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

That’s wonderful news!


6 posted on 04/24/2013 7:27:17 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Great news. Believe it or not, if AR is the fifth state for constitutional carry, IL may be the sixth. The IL legislature has yet to come up with a concealed carry bill that is acceptable enough to be passed by the court imposed deadline of June. No bill = constitutional carry. How ironic.


7 posted on 04/24/2013 7:37:14 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Molon Labe - Shall not be questioned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
How do you know if a person has "a purpose to attempt to unlawfully" do anything?

8 posted on 04/24/2013 7:37:18 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1; All
How do you know if a person has "a purpose to attempt to unlawfully" do anything?

1. Prior history: Are they a prohibited possessor?

2. Did they commit a crime with the weapon? They could be prosecuted after the fact.

3. Ask them. People are amazed at the number of times criminals admit that they were planning to commit a crime.

9 posted on 04/24/2013 8:04:02 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If carrying for lawful purposes becomes lawful without a permit, of what possible use would a relaxed “journey” definition be?


10 posted on 04/24/2013 9:18:19 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sounds good to me! In the past if you were stopped for anything and they found a pocketknife on you they would run a check of your records. If nothing came up you were sent on your way.

If they found something like drugs, a warrent or booze they would also arrest you for “carrying a prohibited weapon.”


11 posted on 04/24/2013 9:18:51 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Do we now register our pressure cookers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell; All

“If carrying for lawful purposes becomes lawful without a permit, of what possible use would a relaxed “journey” definition be?”

Double protection? We already have the Second Amendment, but we have to jump through hoops to exercise it. It almost seems that lawmakers are having to make law more and more explicit in an attempt to prevent judges from finding ways to interpret the law to get the outcome that they wish.


12 posted on 04/25/2013 2:37:22 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson