Despite spamming me with a person’s opinion found on the internet in opposing hard data to the contrary, there is the fact that the British government downgraded marijuana, saw for themselves what a skyrocketing bad result that was and upgraded it again.
BTW, it is kind of ironic how much of a nanny you are in pushing the drugs agenda, considering your name. I didn’t even post to you but you are so driven for drugs that you must spam me regardless.
Could you possibly be a little less of a nanny? I had seen your link the first time.
You’re warping the meaning of “nanny,” there. The other poster may be insisting on his way, but it would be as if a nanny were forcing a parent to let their kid eat ice cream all day. A recognizable sort if nanny would be forestalling the kid from spoiling his appetite. The way you put it is a little like lefties who rail against the “tyranny of the marketplace,” preferring the freedom of state regulation.
Criminologist refutes cannabis-related crime increase claims - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3005416/posts
Despite spamming me
As often as you spam FR with your government-worship.
with a person’s opinion
A scientist's explanation of the scientific flaws in the government's power-grabbing claims.
found on the internet in opposing hard data to the contrary, there is the fact that the British government downgraded marijuana, saw for themselves what a skyrocketing bad result that was
They unscientifically claim they saw it because governments love power - and some self-alleged "conservatives" love to let them have it when it serves their pet preferences.
I didn’t even post to you
That's how Internet forums work; if you don't want your words open to general reply, take them to FReepmail.
I had seen your link the first time.
And only this time responded - and that with a feeble rejoinder.