Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
Randomly assigned, like Clinton’s “Magnificent Seven” randomly assigned cases - at a private monthly meeting where they all chose who would get which cases to cover Clinton’s behind?

OK, so your theory is that (1) there was only a 1-in-15 chance that Roll would get the case (assuming that there ever was a case, which in fact there never was), (2) Roll was the only 1 of the 15 Obama was worried about, (3) but Roll actually didn't even have that 1-in-15 chance because the random selection is fixed anyway, but (4) Obama nonetheless had Roll murdered because....?

24 posted on 04/05/2013 3:10:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

I’m not stating any theory about Judge Roll.

I AM saying that he was killed, and the shooting that killed him resulted in a lot of talk about how dangerous conservatives are, and how elected officials have to be protected from them.

Which played right into the plan for getting Obama a new, LE-dictated BC that claimed a Kapiolani birth - unlike the original written report of Obama’s birth which was amended with affidavits and/or other evidence, to which Fukino, Abercrombie, and OIP Director Tsukiyama have all referred in their public statements.


30 posted on 04/05/2013 4:52:03 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

It’s personal w you & Butter, isn’t it, LL?

Let me ask you something. Have you ever seen anything—even something minor—amiss w Obama’s records? Or in your mind is it a case of pristine, perfectly in-order records across the board, called into question only as an exercise in birther silliness?

Put another way. Do you see Obama as basically honest or dishonest? If you see him as honest...are you serious? After watching him for five or six yrs, you actually believe he is straightforward, aboveboard, truthful & trustworthy? Cite your reasons, please.

If dishonest, then answer this. Do you think he’s often engaged in shading or distorting the truth, or outright lying [as in his repeated statements that the Republicans, not his own WH, proposed sequester], but in one area he’s the model of integrity: i.e.: the area that deals w his birth, his records, his draft registration, etc.?

I’m genuinely curious about all this. I used to be a liberal myself. I was never so far gone, though, that I couldn’t see if a person was overall honest or dishonest. Even during my most passionately liberal days, there were Dems I didn’t like. For example, I recall a Dem primary for governor of MA, and I favored one candidate over the other because he was the more honest od the two.

So I’m asking you, as a former liberal to a current liberal, are you aware of the times when Obama out & out lies? Is that okay w you, ‘because they all do it’? Or do you actually see him as more honest than the typical pol, & therefore above pulling any funny business w, for instance, his draft registration.

Thank you in advance.


107 posted on 04/07/2013 11:40:43 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson