Replies

Can you synposize your objections to the Sheriffs findings, please.

I haven't followed butterdezillion's stuff lately. There was a time when I did. So I can't speak on anything she's said that's terribly recent, but during the time I followed her stuff, I never saw anything that indicated any real fraud.

I haven't seen anything from anybody else that did, either.

With one exception: Fraud on the part of the Cold Case Posse.

Here's one of the better pages out there that talks about that fraud.

In a nutshell, they very clearly claimed they had a 1961 manual that said something very specific. And that specific thing was supposedly proof that Obama's birth certificate was a fake.

And in the press conference where they announced this, they showed the public images that turned out not to be AT ALL from the manual they claimed they had, but were from one manual dated 1968 and another manual dated 1969.

Then, when the real manual turned up (found by a FReeper), it directly contradicted what they claimed it said.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2997228/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3000349/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3001493/posts

Above three links to her latest three articles.

Excellent research!

"Here's one of the better pages out there that talks about that fraud."

I asked you on another thread if you'd care to post a link that wasn't to Doc Conspiracy or Fogbower material to back your claims that the CCP are a bunch of frauds. You blew me off then, and yet here you are, on this thread, posting a link to exactly that type of suspect source.

One would think that a Conservative would be in favor of the most restrictive interpretation of NBC possible (on US soil to TWO US Citizens) so as to aim for the highest degree of presumed loyalty in the individual entrusted with the levers of Executive power, and yet you vociferously and unceasingly advocate a looser, more, I dare say liberal qualification threshold.

I think you're a Fogb(l)ower, Jeff. You can deny it if you wish, but it seems pretty clear to me. Heck there are even links to the cited "Obama Birth Book" site back to Squeeky Fromm's! And we all know what happened to Squeeky Fromm on FR. You're more sophisticated in your tactics than she was, but I think it's only a matter of time before you get canned from this site.

Courtesy Pings to people connected to cited link, and the OP of this thread.

And in the press conference where they announced this, they showed the public images that turned out not to be AT ALL from the manual they claimed they had, but were from one manual dated 1968 and another manual dated 1969.

Then, when the real manual turned up (found by a FReeper), it directly contradicted what they claimed it said.

From your link in post #150, the sheriff's copy has much greater clarity than the 1968 manual. If one is a copy of the other, then the sheriff's copy is the original.