Posted on 03/31/2013 9:33:30 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
The case is called McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman. What is interesting about this case is that newly elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court is Roy Moore. In the past, he has expressed doubts of where Obama was born. Also interesting is that another Alabama Supreme Court Justice named Tom Parker has gone on record arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” on Obama's 'Short Form' birth certificate and 'Long Form' birth certificate were legitimate cause for concern mainly due to Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County Sheriff Office investigation conclusions. Justice Parker wrote on March 27, 2012:
"Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public"
Arpaio's investigation results confirming Obama has a forged birth certificate and a forged Selective Service Registration Application has been submitted to the court in a affidavit. Chief Justice Moore is on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility. He defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that President Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders. Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a natural-born citizen and much evidence that suggests he is not. Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.” “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said. Roy Moore is best known for making national headlines when he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.
This strategy has many consequences, not the least of which is the subversion of the oath the congress critters took. It also creates an atmosphere of lawlessness, which real very powerful background figures desire for the We The People Republic. Put another way, there is much more which must be opposed than just the crimianlity of this sonofabitch the democrips have placed in power. We The People must oppose this trend or be completely usurped and no longer living ina rule of law, Constitutional Republic where we the people are the sovereigns. The people we have elected have committed treachery against us by voiding their oaths. If they get away with that reality, we are no longer our own rulers, we become a ruled people at the mercy of any evil which takes control of the forces to tyrannically rule over US.
Sure, I’m on pins and needles to see him and the lawyers in court like last time. Oh, wait, they gave the judge the finger and didn’t show up.
One judge in Alabama is unlikely to take actions which threaten the entire federal establishment. Because even if he does, he will be opposed in ways we can’t imagine at this time (same as has occurred in all the hearings on this matter held to this date). It’s easier to oppose throuhg non-compliance or outright fraud, than the required alternative.
Can you imagine anyone wanting to re-visit every appointment, every signed piece of federal legislation, every action by the commander in chief, and every executive order, by having to draft a complete set of documents retroactively approving all of these (or, negotiating whether to do so on a case-by-case basis)?
That would require thousands of proactive civil servants whose primacy is support of the constitution (if you know where such a staff can be located, do tell).
You would do well to familiarize yourself with Judge Moore’s stand on the Ten Commandments displayed before the Alabama courthouse.
Then Judge Moore would do well to up his security detail (and make sure his insurance is current too).
tHERE ARE WORSE THINGS THAN DYING FOR YOUR CONVICTIONS ... living as a coward or violator of your oaths comes to mind. The operant term is ‘integrity’, the thing little barry basatrd boy has none of and Judge Moore has in abundance, naturally, because he is a MAN of character not a ‘community organizer’.
The Chicago political machine is not run by men with “convictions” (except for those actually convicted).
Remember it is not just Judge Moore who doubts Obama. There is also Alabama Justice Tom Parker.He stated:
“Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition,which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates ofPresident Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public”
What you point to, i.e. the collateral possibilities, is why it will be very important for Obama and his enablers to quash any negatives in the Alabama case. You can bet the White House that they are working to do such right at this moment.
Has anyone here bothered to read the appellants’ brief? Do you realize that the defendant is the Alabama Secretary of State? Neither Obama nor the Alabama Democratic Party is a party to this suit. The Alabama Supreme Court is not being asked to rule on Obama’s eligibility.
It’s a Alabama eligibility ballot challenge appeal.
The heart of the case is about if Obama was eligible to be on the ballot and how the Secretary of State in Alabama determined him eligible to be on the ballot.
Where is that display now?
The question at this point is not whether or not Obama is eligible but whether the Alabama Secretary of State did enough to determine he was eligible.
No, it’s about whether the SoS has a duty to check the eligibility of presidential candidates, especially if fraud is alleged. If the SoS has no such duty, that’s the end of the issue.
Google is your friend, n00b. Use the force
And Obama is the heart of the example in the appeal.
You forgot to add one line (6.5) between 6 and 7.
“6. Boehner appoints an SP and the SP indicts Onaka, obtains a confession as part of a plea agreement.
6.5. The press and dems will attack Onaka and assinate his character by accusing him of lying.
“7. The press attempts to discredit the SP as a republican plant and hack”
The lower court ruling stated, "If the Secretary of State has knowledge gained from an official source arising from the performance of duties prescribed by law, that a candidate has not met a certifying qualification...the Secretary of State should not certify the candidate." What official source has ever stated Obama was not qualified in any manner? None, that's the problem.
Oh I knew that when I posted it. The answer is 'not in the Alabama Supreme Court building." Within a few months that was the same answer to the question "Where is Roy Moore working?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.