Posted on 03/13/2013 9:14:53 AM PDT by AuntB
"So what am I? I am an advocate of freedom: of the freedom of speech, of the equal treatment of all people under the law. Consequently, I am a foe of the global jihad and Islamic supremacism, which are enemies of both those principles. I know that there are many others like me, but neither party seems interested in us right now, and neither does the conservative movement, such as it is."
"It is time for a new movement, a genuine movement of freedom, one that is not compromised, not beholden, and not corrupted. Are there enough free Americans left to mount such a movement? That I do not know. But I do know that if there aren’t, all is lost, and the denouement will come quickly – more quickly than most people expect."
God love this man, and God love Pamela Geller. I couldn't agree with them more.
To Hades with the Republican, and so-called "conservative", dhimmis.
“While we’re at it, what has Karl Rove got to do with this? Well, Karl Rove and Grover Norquist go WAY back. Karl’s big PAC gives MILLIONS to Grover...”
What’s going on here, AuntB, is the collection of money.
At heart, these two are about collecting money, the accumulation of power, and aiding and abetting Globalism.
Globalists, in their efforts towards One World Government, do not hesitate to take on comrades who’re radical, either communist, such as the International Labor movement, or Jihadists, like the Muslim Brotherhood.
We’ve all heard and read the ancient adage about how pride comes before a fall? Well, no groups are more self-deluded than the communists and Jihadists. They’re sure they can subsume the folks behind Global government, the internationa banksters and financiers, and so they go along with the efforts to destroy Western Civilization and the liberties it has espoused. But they, too, will be destroyed.
Why? When one group controls the world’s money supply, who runs governments really doesn’t matter.
Spencer bump
No. He rejected ON PRINCIPLE an award that came with restrictions that he not talk about the Muslim Brotherhood.
That is the opposite of your claim.
Yes, Spencer is a hero. As is David Horowitz who came to CPAC in 2011 and used his speech to attack CPAC’s snuggle with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Islamists have infiltrated both the left and right in the US. And most are too stupid to notice. Whatever happened to Michelle Bachmann’s , another hero, attack on the MB in our government? Swept under the carpet.
We need another Joe McCarthy to expose the infiltration.
“Yes, Spencer is a hero. As is David Horowitz who came to CPAC in 2011 and used his speech to attack CPAC’s snuggle with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Islamists have infiltrated both the left and right in the US. And most are too stupid to notice. Whatever happened to Michelle Bachmann’s , another hero, attack on the MB in our government? Swept under the carpet.
We need another Joe McCarthy to expose the infiltration.”
Some good people have been trying for years to expose this CPAC/Norquist mess....Gaffney, Horowitz (yes, his 2011 speech was great!)Spencer, Geller, others. Sadly, many GOP don’t want the truth of it out there.
A couple follow up articles by Spencer:
CPAC “Uninvited” event: standing room only
This afternoon I spoke at CPAC on a panel hosted by the Breitbart group: “The Uninvited,” consisting of various speakers who have been barred from speaking at CPAC. Many thanks to the Breitbart News team for having the courage to host an event like this. I spoke about how the conservative movement has been compromised by those who are collaborating with the Muslim Brotherhood, and how we need a genuine opposition to Obama’s pro-Islamic supremacist foreign policy. It was an exciting event with a standing-room-only crowd. I will post the video as soon as it is available: the intrepid Pamela Hall was there filming.
I did not go to the CPAC blog awards event, so I did not get the People’s Choice Blog Award. I did see John Hawkins passing by and gave him a cheery greeting; he looked massively grumpy — maybe because of all the Leftists he has been hanging out with as he continues to dig his hole ever deeper: first it was Salon and now Raw Story. In the Raw Story piece he accuses me of fundraising off his telling me I couldn’t speak about the Norquist/Khan Islamic supremacist connection at CPAC if I received the award. Where and when have I been fundraising on this, John?
Hawkins himself isn’t important. But he is illustrative of a tendency: some people on the Right would sooner sell out their allies and give aid and comfort to the Leftist media than admit that there is a grave problem of Muslim Brotherhood involvement with key and influential people in the conservative movement.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/03/cpac-uninvited-event-standing-room-only.html
and
‘More Voices’: House packed for Breitbart’s “The Uninvited” panel
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/03/-more-voices-house-packed-for-breitbarts-the-uninvited-panel.html
[snip]Spencer piled on. “People are very anxious not to appear bigoted or racist,” but “there are many groups that have the same goals as those who wage violent jihad.” “Infiltration [CPAC] is very great and very sophisticated and those with the best of intentions are falling for it,” Spencer cautioned the room.
During the question and answer portion at the very end, Gaffney reinforced the importance of the fight against radical Islam.“You’ll be canon fodder for the next war if you don’t take these issues seriously,” he said.
thanks. I want to see the video of the session.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.