You assert that "Obama is ineligible because he naturalized in 1983". When later you are asked if you have any evidence that any Certificate of Naturalization even exists you reply "Why would I post specifics without personal knowledge?".
You assert Obama naturalized then claim no knowledge of any naturalization.
You've been caught in a fib. And "why are you desperate to discredit any evidence that would expose Obama as ineliglible?" is just bluster and diversion since you have not presented any evidence to discredit.
You can wipe the cookie crumbs from your face now.
Re-read the message. I’m asking the poster to explain to me why he/she thinks I would post the fact that Obama naturalized in 1983 without personal knowledge of that fact.
And then you claim I discredited myself by insinuating I don’t have personal knowledge of the facts.
This is similar to the attack on Tim Adams. Adams correctly asserted Obama’s long form BC didn’t exist among the vital statistics records of Hawaii DoH.
OBOTS and ConcernedFreepers attacked him for not having access, not showing proof, lying, etc ... And it turned out to be correct. Obama’s long form BC was sealed and archived by order of the Court. Access is limited and away from HI DoH employees because it is sealed.
Stop trying to find loopholes to protect Obama. He’s not eligible. He naturalized in 1983. The only legal way to prove it is to subpoena it after surviving a motion to dismiss. Allegations in complaints aren’t proven by the Plaintiff. Allegations must be defended by the Defendant.