Re-read the message. I’m asking the poster to explain to me why he/she thinks I would post the fact that Obama naturalized in 1983 without personal knowledge of that fact.
And then you claim I discredited myself by insinuating I don’t have personal knowledge of the facts.
This is similar to the attack on Tim Adams. Adams correctly asserted Obama’s long form BC didn’t exist among the vital statistics records of Hawaii DoH.
OBOTS and ConcernedFreepers attacked him for not having access, not showing proof, lying, etc ... And it turned out to be correct. Obama’s long form BC was sealed and archived by order of the Court. Access is limited and away from HI DoH employees because it is sealed.
Stop trying to find loopholes to protect Obama. He’s not eligible. He naturalized in 1983. The only legal way to prove it is to subpoena it after surviving a motion to dismiss. Allegations in complaints aren’t proven by the Plaintiff. Allegations must be defended by the Defendant.
First off there is no “attack”. Your posts conflict with themselves which is all I’ve pointed out.
You have also claimed to have seen a Certificate of Loss of Nationality http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2963803/posts?page=16#16
Assertions without supporting evidence are not credible. An affidavit attesting that you have seen either/both Obama’s Certificate of Loss of Nationality and Obama’s 1983 Certificate of Naturalization would be credible.
No need to reveal any information contained on these Certificates, merely attest that they exist.