“Do you believe that there is anyone who can demonstrate such a particular harm?”
Yes! Anyone charged with a Federal crime for violating a law signed by the usurper can challenge the law if they complain of the usurper before trial begins.
Anyone who has a proposed adverse action to be taken against them presented to an appointee of the usurper can challenge the appointment if they complain of the usurper appointment before a decision has been made.
For example, a Judicial appointment by Obama can be challenged if the challenge is made before trial begins. Appointments by a usurper are not valid if the challenge is made before adjudication begins.
Of course, the Judicial branch always has the option of reassigning a judge that wasn’t appointed by Obama to the defendant complaining the Obama appointed judge is not valid.
You assert that "Obama is ineligible because he naturalized in 1983". When later you are asked if you have any evidence that any Certificate of Naturalization even exists you reply "Why would I post specifics without personal knowledge?".
You assert Obama naturalized then claim no knowledge of any naturalization.
You've been caught in a fib. And "why are you desperate to discredit any evidence that would expose Obama as ineliglible?" is just bluster and diversion since you have not presented any evidence to discredit.
You can wipe the cookie crumbs from your face now.
“Do you believe that there is anyone who can demonstrate such a particular harm?”
Since civil suits only require allegations and not proof to be submitted with a complaint, Orly should allege Obama is ineligible for POTUS because he is not a naturalized citizen AND that she personally loaned Obama, as an individual, $100 Million. He agreed to pay back $125 Million by Jan. 01, 2013 and failed to do so.
Since Obama doesn’t file answers to civil suits, all allegations will be found to have merit by the Court. And it removes the obstacle of subject matter jurisdiction and justiciability.