Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston

regarding children of legal immigrants, because that is settled law. Such children are natural born citizens.
_______________________________________

No theyre not

If the registered aliens are not yet American citizens the children are American citizens but not NBC

If the parents have both been naturalized BEFORE the child was born and are now therefore American citizens then the child and any other children born will be NBC...


885 posted on 03/10/2013 6:26:19 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies ]


To: Tennessee Nana
No theyre not

Lol.

Certainly, they are.

Believe me, I've studied this issue from every possible angle.

I've now read every significant court case and heard every birther argument.

And all of those arguments are absolute BS.

See some of the recent discussion, including the recent post on Wong Kim Ark.

Don't you ever wonder why there's not a single court in the entire country that will even give the time of day to these claims? Except, in some cases, to simply cite Wong Kim Ark and tell the plaintiffs to go away?

It's because EVERY SINGLE COURT AND EVERY SINGLE JUDGE IN THE COUNTRY understands that this particular question was settled long ago.

It is only uninformed people commenting on the internet that believe there is anything to these arguments.

Unfortunately, uninformed people vote. And some of them are just fooled enough to actually WITHHOLD their votes from perfectly eligible candidates - like TED CRUZ - and even elect idiot liberals instead, because of the depth of their deception.

There just isn't a case. Because as has been extensively discussed in this thread, the claim is absolute BS.

I don't know how I can be any clearer than that. The only lamentable thing is that I feel there is no way that I can convey how extremely clear it is, both legally and historically speaking, that there is NOTHING to the two citizen parent claim.

888 posted on 03/10/2013 6:35:42 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]

To: Tennessee Nana

The courts have ruled differently. For example, specific to the eligibility of Obama to receive Indiana’s Electoral votes in 2008, in Ankeny v Daniels, a three judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled unanimously: “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—November 12, 2009
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf

That ruling has not been overturned by a higher court.


892 posted on 03/10/2013 6:58:07 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson