Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DoctorBulldog
Ah! Thank you for digging up that quote by Pinckney. I knew there was another Framer who had something to say about it, but I couldn't recall who it was.

Attachment, yes. But how much attachment?

See my last comment to Windflier & Rogers. And tell me, if you can, how just fourteen years' residency in the country, can provide the kind of attachment you're talking about.

Also tell me, if you can... why FOURTEEN years?

684 posted on 03/09/2013 11:04:57 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston

Well, my understanding of the 14 year requirement comes from a faulty memory of my Constitutional Studies courses almost 30 years ago. From what I remember the professor saying, it seemed to have had something to do with wanting the first President to have been physically in the United States before the War of Independence started.

So, let me see... 1787 - 14yrs = 1773...

But still, it doesn’t make sense as to why it wasn’t grandfathered out and a much stricter residency requirement eventually kick in.

Anyway, the professor might of been blowing smoke, or I might be mis-remembering it, but that’s my memory of it and I’m sticking to it! LOL

Cheers!


687 posted on 03/09/2013 11:29:06 PM PST by DoctorBulldog (Obama sucks. End of story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson