Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston

Well, my understanding of the 14 year requirement comes from a faulty memory of my Constitutional Studies courses almost 30 years ago. From what I remember the professor saying, it seemed to have had something to do with wanting the first President to have been physically in the United States before the War of Independence started.

So, let me see... 1787 - 14yrs = 1773...

But still, it doesn’t make sense as to why it wasn’t grandfathered out and a much stricter residency requirement eventually kick in.

Anyway, the professor might of been blowing smoke, or I might be mis-remembering it, but that’s my memory of it and I’m sticking to it! LOL

Cheers!


687 posted on 03/09/2013 11:29:06 PM PST by DoctorBulldog (Obama sucks. End of story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies ]


To: DoctorBulldog
So, let me see... 1787 - 14yrs = 1773...

Ah. Nice theory.

But it doesn't add up, does it? You're 2 to 3 years off.

So why 14? Why not 11 or 12?

692 posted on 03/09/2013 11:46:13 PM PST by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson