If there was a court ruling in 1971 as you say, then why can’t Onaka verify any birth facts for Obama? If legal birth facts were determined in 1971 then the resulting BC would be legally valid and Onaka would have to verify those facts when requested. But he wouldn’t. Why not?
And why would they be changing BC#’s now?
IOW, the evidence we have now refutes the claim that there was a 1971 ruling, so you need to provide evidence that there was such a ruling. It should be in the court records if it was associated with the SAD/BHO divorce and BHO challenging a Soetoro adoption.
The divorce record for Norman Asing and his first wife, Charlotte, had as the last entry a pleading by Norman to stop child support because he had given his consent for the two boys (Norman Jr and Nathan) to be adopted by their stepdad. The judge said that child support would be stopped unless the adoption fell through. So the complete record concerning the divorce includes reference to adoption proceedings.
In the divorce record for Norman Asing and his 2nd wife, Connie, the adoptions of children associated with that marriage were disclosed.
So if BHO in 1971 challenged Lolo’s ability to adopt Obama, claim him as a dependent, etc, that should be included in the Ann-Lolo divorce. That information wouldn’t be sealed from the divorce record even though the adoption records themselves would be sealed.
Someone should hire you to think for them. :)
Obama was in the legal custody of Catholic Soc Serv and the physical custody Madelyn Payne from 1971 to 1979. Stanley Ann and Lolo were stripped of their parental rights until 1979, Obama’s 18th Bday. Stanley Ann and Lolo divorced in 1981 and claimed Obama as an adult dependent upon them for education expense.