Replies

Sven, do you realize that Hawaii statute allows the HDOH to totally fabricate a birth certificate if law enforcement claims the registrant needs a fictitious birth certificate in order to be safe?

When that is done the resulting BC has to be assigned a different number than the original BC# that registrant had. This is the only case where somebody can have a BC that has a different BC# than what was given to the BC originally.

We have at least 3 people whose August 1961 BC#’s from the HDOH office cannot be what they were given in 1961, based on either of the 2 contradictory numbering methods described by former and current HDOH spokesmen: Barack Obama, Stig Waidelich, and Virginia Sunahara. If Johanna Ah Nee’s forged BC is really from the HDOH that would be another one (Onaka’s signature doesn’t seem to be right, and the BC# itself has digits overlap, which could not have happened on a genuine BC - but those could be red flags put in by the person at the HDOH who was forced to create the forgery, like the red flags described below. I suspect that BC did come from the HDOH but it is another forgery that Fuddy forced her workers to create and which they resisted; see below. If this came from the HDOH then we have FOUR Aug 1961 BC#’s that the HDOH has falsified).

Onaka has indirectly confirmed that Obama’s Hawaii birth record is not legally valid, and Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate has 3 blatant signs of forgery within the same line that has the handwritten, anomalous BC#: the abbreviation T. H. (which stands for Territory of Hawaii), unmatching fonts between T.H. and FILE NO, and FILE and NO being misaligned with T.H. It took extra effort to put in those glaring signs of forgery, so somebody at the HDOH is taking time to make sure that death certificate is recognized as a forgery from the HDOH.

In addition, I have proven that the HDOH specifically added non-valid names to their 1960-64 birth index.

The evidence is mounting to the inescapable conclusion that the HDOH is fabricating and manipulating BC#’s, vital records, the database, and their birth index list (as well as violating a ton of laws) in order to give Obama a fabricated BC - presumably because it is necessary for his “safety”.

When a BC is fabricated at the request of law enforcement, it will claim whatever law enforcement (Eric Holder?) says it needs to say. Just like BC’s are fabricated after an adoption, when a court tells the HDOH what the new BC has to say. It will be fabricated to include signatures of all the people who would have signed if the birth really happened that way. It will show processing dates that claim the record existed from the very beginning. Etc. It is totally fabricated; it has no resemblance to the truth whatsoever.

But even with the ability to create a totally fake BC, what Obama got from the HDOH had to be altered in order to get the image posted on the White House website. That is confirmed by Alvin Onaka, who when asked would not verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” or that the information in the White House image is “identical to” the information in the original record on file. The two certifying elements of Alvin Onaka in the White House image each contain a red flag similar to the red flags put in the HDOH-forged Sunahara death certificate: TXE instead of THE in the certifying statement, and a smiley face added to the signature.

With the evidence we have right now, it would be legally negligent to claim that Obama was born in Hawaii. Onaka cannot verify any of Obama’s birth facts, because there is no legally valid record claiming those birth facts. Instead, what we’ve got appears to be mutiny in the HDOH office, where Loretta Fuddy is requiring HDOH workers to break the laws and the office workers are resisting by putting in red flags.

There is no “legal hurdle” and the evidence all says, instead, that Loretta Fuddy is in on criminal records manipulation to hide Obama’s non-valid birth record - and people in her staff are putting in red flags to expose what she has done. It’s no wonder that the presumably non-complicit interim HDOH Director Neal Palafox was forced to resign (though the system lied to hide that they forced him to) right at the time that the “safety” issue was being exploited from the assassination of Judge John Roll in AZ (where an eligibility bill was imminent, that Abercrombie had said he feared - shortly before telling a Star-Advertiser columnist that an investigation had found something “actually written down” in the “archives” and telling his friend Mike Evans that there was no BC for Obama in HI). Judge Roll is the judge who would have heard the DOJ’s challenge of an AZ eligibility bill, and he was replaced by an Obama appointee. That assassination had key information that changed over time (with part of the investigation under the control of Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, who immediately used the shooting to blame “The Tea Party”, etc - as did Janet Napolitano... and the other part under the control of Eric Holder’s DOJ), the shooter was known by the military installation (that handles mind control research and creation of unsuspecting assassins) to have mental problems and to have used drugs - IOW, the perfect person to use as an unwitting assassin because if he said he heard voices telling him to do the assassination it would be attributed to schizophrenia. And the shooter was familiar and had posted on Facebook about mind control techniques. Another ex-military guy who was at the scene of the shooting was also familiar with mind control techniques.

Sigh. There’s just too much evidence/information to get into one post. The timeline of events is really incriminating when you see it all in context. But a person really doesn’t even need to know all that. All you need to know is that Onaka had to use the words male, Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama in his letter of verification if he could verify any of those claims as existing on a valid BC - and he didn’t.

And then you have a HI COLB adjudicated post-1961 resulting in a Court order for the HDOH registrar to file a record of vital statistics for Barack Hussein Obama II which trumps all previous facts or anomalies with the birth record or lack thereof.

Date Accepted Aug 8, 1961 means the attestation of 3 people present at the birth event swear the information provided is correct.

Date Filed Aug 8, 1961 means a Court ordered the vital record filed and backdated to Aug 8, 1961. At some point in time after 1961 (my best guess is 1971 because I believe BHO Sr returned to Hawaii to contest the Soetoro adoption at that time), a Hawaii Court heard testimony and examined evidence on Barack Hussein Obama’s II live birth event. The Court decided he was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu, HI.

Any indiscretions, guesses, lies, manipulations and untruths made about Obama’s live birth event are wiped clean by the Court’s 1971 ruling on Obama’s birth event. The court is a trier of fact and determined the facts to be as they were published on Obama’s COLB backdated to Aug 8, 1961.

You’ll never overcome this hurdle because all witnesses to the Aug 4, 1961 live event are deceased. The Court’s 1971 ruling is the final word on the matter.