Perhaps Arpaio was able to get one of them (SOS Ken Bennett or AG Tom Horne) to closely examine the evidence of the forgeries or alternatively new evidence of foreign birth.
Bennett had to honor the HI “authentication” of the existence of a birth record of some sort in HI as sufficient to allow Barry onto the AZ ballot, but that HI authentication of HI records doesn’t explain or absolve Barry from complicity in presenting to the voting public a clear forgery.
Note that having a forged BC doesn’t prove ineligibility, so additional evidence would have to have been found, IMO.
‘Note that having a forged BC doesn’t prove ineligibility...’
IMHO, by presenting a forged bc, obama shows that he either does not have an authentic bc, or he has 1 that has damning evidence that he is not what he pretends to be.
The burden of proof is on obama.
The digital image he presented on the Internet has been proven fraudulent by a law enforcement official.
So unless he shows the authentic hard-copy bc from USA he is NOT eligible to be on the ballot or be the president of the USA. HE SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR HIS FRAUDULENT BC.
Anywhere we go to present a forged bc to apply for something from the gov, we will be disqualified and PROSECUTED.
BUT OBOZO CAN ASCEND TO THE WH WITH A FORGED BC?
Actually, what Onaka legally confirmed to Bennett was that the HI birth record is not legally valid. Onaka would not verify ANY of the birth facts that Bennett submitted on the application form for a letter of verification, even though Onaka did verify that those are the claims that are on the record they have. The only LAWFUL reason for him to not verify those facts is if he can’t, and the only reason he couldn’t verify them if that’s what their record claims.... is if the record itself is not valid.
Bennett’s duty was to keep Obama OFF the ballot because nobody in this country can certify that Obama is eligible. According to HI statute, that HI BC means NOTHING legally unless and until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and the probative value is determined. Judicial and administrative persons and bodies are bound to the Federal Rules of Evidence.
IOW, without a court procedure, there is no way that Obama can qualify by Jan 20, 2013 as required by the 20th Amendment. And there is no way he EVER qualified for the last 4 years either.
This is all in the public record now. It is legally established. Every state SOS has been informed of this, by Attorney Larry Klayman. Every state AG has also been informed. Every one of them knows that Obama cannot qualify. If even one of them did the right thing this would blow wide open. At the very least someone with standing would take this to the Supreme Court. Congress is not an administrative or judicial body so nothing it does can resolve the issue of whether Obama qualifies - and the 20th Amendment says that the “president elect” can still fail to qualify by Jan 20th, so Constitutional QUALIFICATIONS for the Presidency fall to the only body left after Congress has certified the electoral winner: the courts.
SCOTUS is badly compromised. We saw that with John Roberts’ ruling on Obamacare. But if the legal facts are made known to the general public through the media and in a court hearing, it would be much, much harder for anybody to pretend that 2008 was anything but a coup by a foreign enemy combatant.