Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6; SvenMagnussen

If SAD were the mother and BHO the father, and the DOB and place were accurate, there would have been no need for a forgery.

Leaving aside the adoption by Soetoro and subsequent locking up of the original B.C. as proposed by Sven Magnussen). And I could be wrong, but even if the original B.C. if it listed SAD and BHO as parents, perhaps could be obtained by the guy in the WH even if it were not “legal” since the DoH is his plaything.

So I see no need for a clumsy forgery in any case, if the purported parents were the real ones.

This is leaving aside the other aberrations that lead the thoughtful followers of this to conclude that neither purported parent is factually a parent.

Courtesy ping to S.M.


294 posted on 12/19/2012 11:26:48 AM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

“If SAD were the mother and BHO the father, and the DOB and place were accurate, there would have been no need for a forgery.”

The original BC was sealed and archived after the Soetoro adoption. Later, the Soetoro adoption was annulled and the original BC could have been unsealed and used as Obama’s verification of live birth in Hawaii.

Why was the original BC not unsealed when the Soetoro adoption was annulled?

Good question. Before Concerned Freepers demand I provide verifiable proof of Obama’s protected, private records, I can only speculate why the original was not unsealed and used after the Soetoro adoption was annulled.

1) Stanley Ann, 1971, testified BHO Sr was not the father and did not have a right to contest the Soetoro Adoption in 1971. In 1961, she had signed a sworn affidavit (the original long form BC) the information on the vital record was accurate. She contradicted herself in 1971.

The judge, in Hawaii, after hearing and examining evidence, decided BHO Sr was the father and a new COLB would have to be created with BHO Sr as the father and Stanley Ann’s sworn affidavit removed because she contradicted herself, under oath, in 1971.

2) The document provided to the White House is stamped with a statement; such as, “Sealed by order of the Court.” Obama doesn’t want people to know the Soetoro adoption was annulled.

Postscript: Statements labeled 1) and 2) are my opinion and should not be construed as verified fact.


336 posted on 12/20/2012 10:50:31 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson