Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

“If SAD were the mother and BHO the father, and the DOB and place were accurate, there would have been no need for a forgery.”

The original BC was sealed and archived after the Soetoro adoption. Later, the Soetoro adoption was annulled and the original BC could have been unsealed and used as Obama’s verification of live birth in Hawaii.

Why was the original BC not unsealed when the Soetoro adoption was annulled?

Good question. Before Concerned Freepers demand I provide verifiable proof of Obama’s protected, private records, I can only speculate why the original was not unsealed and used after the Soetoro adoption was annulled.

1) Stanley Ann, 1971, testified BHO Sr was not the father and did not have a right to contest the Soetoro Adoption in 1971. In 1961, she had signed a sworn affidavit (the original long form BC) the information on the vital record was accurate. She contradicted herself in 1971.

The judge, in Hawaii, after hearing and examining evidence, decided BHO Sr was the father and a new COLB would have to be created with BHO Sr as the father and Stanley Ann’s sworn affidavit removed because she contradicted herself, under oath, in 1971.

2) The document provided to the White House is stamped with a statement; such as, “Sealed by order of the Court.” Obama doesn’t want people to know the Soetoro adoption was annulled.

Postscript: Statements labeled 1) and 2) are my opinion and should not be construed as verified fact.


336 posted on 12/20/2012 10:50:31 AM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen

Thank you for the reply. I have a couple more questions, if you want to take a stab at them:

1. Can an adopted child (even if un-adpoted later on) gain access to the original birth certificate and then if he wants to, make it public?

2. IMHO from reading research on FR since summer 2008, I do not think that the purported parents are the real parents. If that is the case, then the current President is using a fake ID. Aside from any forgeries, he is using someone elses’ name that he was not born with and never was issued via a legal name change.

What are the legal ramifications of this?


343 posted on 12/20/2012 2:40:28 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

To: SvenMagnussen

Placemark for reading and replying. Had electricity and internet outages and then flu...


431 posted on 01/02/2013 6:19:45 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson