It’s about money because that’s what the original article is defending, charging more as a form of rationing. Rationing in these situations is good. Charging 5 times as much isn’t rationing, even though the article (and people defending that position) thinks it is.
“Charging 5 times as much isn’t rationing”
No, no potential buyer was ever turned off by 5 times higher prices. Whoever came up with that insane notion?/s