Posted on 10/21/2012 6:27:52 PM PDT by expat1000
Bill Clinton is supposed to be the secret weapon in this race. The Oxford draft dodging grad who can appeal to working Americans because he has a Southern accent. The problem is that Bill also has a history of melting down during campaigns.
Clintons incredible campaigning abilities have been largely overstated. Clinton won two presidential elections against ridiculously weak Republican candidates who barely showed up. Thats also how he became Governor of Arkansas. He blew the 2008 primaries and now hes beginning to melt down all over again.
This shouldnt be a race. The only reason it is, is because Americans are impatient on things not made before yesterday and they dont understand why the economy is not totally hunky-dory again.
Clintons gaffe is a natural one for an elitist liberal, but any serious campaigner knows better than to blame people who are out of work and struggling to feed their families for not being on board with your campaign. Its a deadly and easily exploitable mistake.
Bill Clinton is channeling former ABC news anchor Peter Jennings response to the 1994 midterm elections where the American people turned on the Democratic Party.
Some thoughts on those angry voters. Ask parents of any two-year-old and they can tell you about those temper tantrums: the stomping feet, the rolling eyes, the screaming. Imagine a nation full of uncontrolled two-year-old rage. The voters had a temper tantrum last week.
Clintons gaffe wasnt as bad as Jennings, but its a sign that hes beginning to melt down. This was how it happened in South Carolina in 2008 when Clintons ego and competitiveness took the lead and he began speaking out without thinking about the political consequences. And now its happening again.
Clinton has made a fortune and its in poor taste for him to sneer at Americans for being too impatient for an economic recovery. People who are living from paycheck to paycheck have a right to demand results from their elected officials and they have a right to wonder why a government that runs trillion dollar deficits keeps sending them empty promises instead of a way out.
That boy has to remember who the big dog is or he's got about this much chance of getting reelected.
Old Cankles could try it, but who in their right mind believes that most Democrats would enthusiastically support a worn out has-been who should have gotten the hook years ago?
The Dim rank and file are about the most shallow, superficial people there are. They'll be looking for another exciting rock star to lead their party back to the White House. Hillary? She's not just old news, she's ancient history. I think she's actually aging in dog years.
I agree —she’s very over the hill. You and I won’t vote for her. Neither will our friends.
Will she RUN?
Yes.
I wouldn't go betting good money on that, if I were you. Four years is a mighty long time for someone as worn out and rapidly aging, as Hillary is.
I doubt if she'll have the stamina to do much public speaking in four years, let alone, spend two grueling years running for president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.