They live a hurting, deviant, and perverted lifestyle and need help. Calling homosexuality anything else is like calling cancer healthy and good. Only a sick society and/or world "calls evil good and good evil."
Seems to me the whole gay-rights theory depends on there being a “gay gene”. Meaning, that the people who have this gene can’t help themselves and therefore need “protection of their rights”. Since we’ve been unable to isolate this gay gene it kind of makes the whole gay rights thing a sham, since it reduces homosexuality to a preference and not hard wired. Why should we as a society overturn thousands of years of marriage law to please a particular preference?
In a society where butt < expletive deleted > is celebrated, then what is unacceptable?
Whatever rights these queers think are coming to them, have no founding in The U.S. Constitution.
As a group, they serve no function to society. within their own, they cannot propogate, except by either surrogate or unnatural means, which is outside normal society’s realm. If they do not, they neither add nor subtract from society’s population. It has been shown that there is a propensity for a major death-dealing illness to be spread among themselves, and to those outside their group, should someone get too close in relations. They yell and scream for acceptance, but spew intolerance at the next sentence. They demand legal rights, for which there was no legal basis, until President Clinton, signed the Federal Discrimination Hiring law.
They deserve no more legal consideration than any other American, and that includes those who hyphenate their background. They already have all the rights necessary.
‘Marriage’ is not a ‘right’, but is a ‘rite of passage’ within society. It is the announcement of the next generation, the announcement of the joining of the partners’ backgrounds, and at one time, the announcement of legal political ties between countries.
The queers cannot brook that historical fact, nor can they crash that ‘glass wall’, because they produce neither a generation, a joining of partners’ backgrounds via childbirth, nor can they declare any political ties, because they are so few a minority.
Pretty soon the “Get the Government out of Marriage” bunch will join this thread, seeking to re-define marriage in that way, while claiming they’re not (and claiming they’re not carrying water for the pro-gay marriage crowd).
I refuse to let homos, fags or sodomites misuse the word, gay.
Gays are just like Obama. ...well, yeah, exactly like him, but that isn’t exactly what I mean. Gays are a group, not individuals. They don’t come to us as a man or a woman of self worth, but as a movement, a group bowel movement of sorts, dumped on the rest of society. That’s what I mean about Obama. Say anything against him, and the racist chants begin, because he isn’t an individual. He doesn’t come to us as a man, but as part of an aggrieved group, dumping on the rest of us. That’s why homosexuals love him. That, and the other reason. That’s a big reason why reasonable people are repulsed by them, among other things.
Placemark.