Posted on 08/29/2012 3:23:29 AM PDT by Bratch
For the record, it's not my blog. I don't have the required skill to do something like that.
Since you're from Kentucky, your non-vote won't matter, and you can rail like a first grader that didn't get his nap, but people that live in swing states need to really look at the results of their selfish, feel good, childish protest.You spouted paragraph after paragraph and all you said that since the mean old nasty party didn't give you what you wanted, you would hold your breath and turn blue and not vote for Romney.
By you own admission, you have no principles, since you said that could have been "won over if".
If Mitt and the RNC had done what you wanted, "what ever the hell that might be", you would have voted for Romney.
Loud mouthed, but very well written, you are just another hypocrite, cry baby, that is taking their ball and going home.
Next.
I tend to post articles that I believe would be of interest to readers of this site. That doesn't mean I necessarily agree with them.
But thanks for your comments.
You consider Paulites Tea Party?
I await your comments on the blog you posted.
Whatever they are - they are morons and dolts. There is nothing “pure” or “principled” about handing obama 4 more years to destroy this country. NOTHING
These delusional FREAKS can try to convince themselves that they occupy some higher moral ground, but they don’t. They occupy the sewer along w obama and his gang of criminals, layabouts, communists, marxists, etc,.
Yes he would... He had a lot of Mormons in his administration.... He called the Mormon Tabernacle Choir, America’s Choir..
LOL....Not really related, but it does affect my viewpoint in some ways...I live in a town where every major sports team is always waiting and hoping for "next time," and "next time" never comes.
I see the down ticket vote as more important than the Presidential vote. I don't care if 0bama wins, but we must take the House and Senate in CONSERVATIVES. I do view this as being an effective way of stopping the 0bama agenda and the RINO agenda. So we send legislation up to repeal say ...0bamacare? 0bama vetos it as expected. But, we then have the opportunity to overturn the veto.
Under RINO Romney...well things just might be a little soft around the middle, there will be less 'fire' to get things corrected, and just as the pace under RINO Romney to move liberally forward will be slow...so will the corrective legislation be slow. And this will be Romney's downfall.
No can do.
The fact that you even asked that question demonstrates why you have no business being on this forum.
To these freaks - NOW IS EXACTLY THE TIME TO SEND A MESSAGE - since they can enact the most damage by handing obama 4 more years since their little conservative unicorn in the sky did not ride down on a rainbow from the heavens.
/johnny
Follow the live thread here:
GOP Rules Committee Rapidly Moving to Shut Out Grassroots at 2:00 p.m. Today (It's not over)
with special attention to THIS post:
Yup. I hate to tell them I told them so, but I told them so.
You want a bellyful of Romney hemlock?
You vote how you like..I will vote to defeat the Marxist Obama.
Time for R and R
The author seems well-connected, but the article itself strikes me as somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction.
That said, the thing I’m most concerned about is the ability now of the RNC to change its rules between conventions. As far as I can tell, this is an unprecedented step that has nothing to do with the normal, inside baseball squabbles.
Can it be used to squash potential rivals in the event of a Romney Presidency? The answer is above my pay grade.
I prefer to take my chances with Romney brew..I KNOW what Obama has served up to this nation..
No, but right now, they are necessary allies against the corrupt, decrepit GOP-E.
Palin: ‘Worst thing’ GOP can do is marginalize Ron Paul supporters
I did notice that during the call of states, the bulk of Iowa’s votes went to Ron Paul. Rick Santorum won that caucus followed by Governor Romney. That vote did not make sense and did not seem fair. What actually happened here? Was this rule change aimed at Ron Paul’s people or conservatives in general? Inquiring minds want to know.
Yeah. Some Paultards got neutered.
Ain't that a shame?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.