I get the fact that you don’t like Mitt Romney. I get the fact that Romney has taken positions that neither you nor I agree with. But at this point we have a choice: Romney or Obama for the next four years. If you believe that Obama would be the better choice, then you can reel off a list of Romney’s sins. If you believe that it doesn’t matter who wins, you can reel off Romney’s sins and Obama’s sins and convince people that neither one deserves the job, but you didn’t. But if you believe as I do that it makes a big difference and that our number one, two and three objective is the defeat of Obama, it makes no sense to try to convince people that Romney should not be elected. I’ll let Jim Robinson tell you himself which way he’ll vote this November. But I would be shocked to learn that, given Jim’s antipathy toward socialism, and given a choice between Obama and Romney, he would vote to give the Big O another 4 years. (Of course in California Jim’s vote may not sway the state.)
Yeah, I guess I didn't. At least not while talking to you. Doesn't mean that I haven't posted comparisons between Obama and Romney many times. I have.
Bottom line...the differences between Obama and Romney are only in degree - not in kind. They're in foursquare agreement on the major planks of their respective agendas. That's a fact which is proven by their records.
Mark my words. There's going to be widespread buyer's remorse on the right after this guy's been in office for a while. He's going to pick up right where he left off in Massachusetts, and there won't be enough TEA in Congress to stop him. All of you who are selling out your principles to support this liberal, are going to wonder why you sold yourselves so cheaply. At least I hope you'll have enough of a conscience to stop and reflect on what you've done.
But perhaps I've read you Romney supporters wrong all along. Maybe party really is more important to you than principle.