Which I imagine it quite automaticially would have been, the Bomford birth was in 1959. What the Daily Pen needs to find out is WHEN the Bomford document was accessed. If that access was say late in 1963 or early 1964, then you can take it the document was used to produce a forgery for the divorce and custody. If access was sometime around the period of the Bomford kerfuffle, in 2009, then it would be safe to assume the document was accessed from the BOMFORD FAMILY WEBSITE.
You write as if there are TWO ITMES on the record in the archives, is that right? One for Bomford and one for an OBAMA? Can you explain that?
One would certainly be the original Bomford record, the second would be the for the child of the kenyan which he took to back to Kenya with him. You know who I mean.
Correct. The claim is that there is a Bomford item from Australia and an Obama item from Kenya 1961 with similar formats which were fused into the forged Kenya document with the Australian Bomford filing numbers.
This is what the updated version of the article says (update as of 07/23/12):
“It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that “birthers” had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama’s forgers to create “shell game” confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama’s forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.”