Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

I had ruled out the delayed birth certificate..but it does say affidavit signed by the parent((S)). That would mean both parent’s signature. You may be on to something....1971 visit????

_______________________________________________________________________

My guess is that everything was re-baselined in terms of documentation in 1971. Regardless of the facts, lack of father being named in 1961, etc. etc.

Again, it is obvious Obama SR was NEEDED for something. Affidavits stating the child was his, claiming the child to terminate Lolo Soetoro as father and terminated Indonesian citizenship, etc. etc.

But he had a role to play there and not just drink with his ol’ buddies.

Remember Obama SR never signed or acknowledged the divorce in 1964. I believe it has been shown it was ‘knock and nailed’ at his address at the time and after a period of no response the divorce was completed without his signature or acknowledgement. Beyond the known fake BCs this is the first appearance in formal records for “Barack Hussein Obama II”. A one way divorce that seems to be leveraged almost soley to establish a name for the child. Again, remember there was no marriage certificate. There likely was no real marriage. This action would give a legally fatherless child a father.

Now for some off the cuff conjecture....

Why would a one divorce be done where there likely was no marriage to start with?
- Give a fatherless child a name. Or give a child whose father is famous communist poet a name. Either explains the ‘9’ Not Stated entries in source image of the LFBC forgery.

Why is Obama SR later needed in person?
- He is the legal father of record but there is nothing with his signature or acknowledgement of that fact in 1970 or 1971. With a guardian/citizenship transfer for Barry in the works the documentation is getting more scrutiny. So the paperwork has to be ‘tightened up’. And again as of 1971 the past is rewritten - no matter what it really was. Using Hawaii’s ‘just sign here’ BC laws all is legally good. And the transfer of Barry from Indonesia to Hawaii can happen - for whatever reason it happened.

Anyone who works with orphans or ‘at risk’ kids will tell you how easy it is to get judges and courts to to approve records updating when it ‘benefits the child’ . And in Hawaii it was probably even easier.


337 posted on 07/23/2012 3:59:47 PM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6

Just conjucture about why the divorce when no marriage. If she had put SR on the BC thinking they were legally married, then she would probably have to show she had custody in order to leave the country and legally live in Indonesia with Lolo. Remember the rules in Indonesia about children of certain age living in your home. They had to be yours...thus the adoption (of sorts)

Not having custody is NOT giving up your right to the child. It could be that SR signed documents relinquishing parental rights. He gave up custody whether he was present at the divorce or not. Did he give up parental rights in 71? If so documents should be filed in HI family court division.


339 posted on 07/23/2012 4:16:59 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: bluecat6; hoosiermama
Anyone who works with orphans or ‘at risk’ kids will tell you how easy it is to get judges and courts to to approve records updating when it ‘benefits the child’ . And in Hawaii it was probably even easier.

BTDT. They will rubber stamp blatant lies whether it benefits the child, the court or just because it's Tuesday which means that something BIG was needed of Sr. that couldn't be handled with a legally signed and witnessed statement from Kenya. There was something that needed him in HI in person for over a month on the Dunhams' dime. That means there is a case file with court dockets and schedules with the judge and parties named along with their attorneys, there are attorney files, there are documents filed in the clerk's office, there are index books in both the family court and the county clerk's office, the health dept, etc. There could also be something in the criminal court records. It's all there in the old dusty boxes unless those have been made to disappear. It's very easy to walk out with these old files. Bound indexes are hard to fix so it's easier to make the entire book disappear. An investigative team would have to have full access to be able to see where the holes are during Christmas '71 and back say the six months prior. If "Dreams" is to be believed (cough), the Dunhams weren't happy about Sr. being there so they had to have exhausted every means to proceed with whatever it was without his presence so there has to be a paper trail before his arrival. They may have spoken to a number of attorneys and been in front of more than one judge.

379 posted on 07/24/2012 7:38:02 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: bluecat6; hoosiermama

Missing marriage certificate (marriage license) and missing Passport application for SAD, missing entry (one week’s) from overseas, plus Inspector Smith’s copy w/footprint, hmmm!!!

Could it be SAD got married in Kenya and stayed there until Barry was born yet the sperm donor FMD???


399 posted on 07/24/2012 1:23:02 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson