Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
FROM THE MIND OF MINOLTA!
Yes, and straight into legend it went; how desperate to show this was a family were they? They had to CREATE one?
The birth date is usually a week or so beyond the 9 month period. This calculator shows the deed was done on or about Oct. 28, 1960. What might be of interest is that Halloween that year was on Monday making the 28th a Friday. Could be SAD got a bit wild during a Halloween party that weekend. That could be a lead.
In another view, her hands look they have been borrowed from a cadaver. IMO, the one image they had of her body sitting in a chair, was used for both images, but her hands weren't doing what they needed to be doing to hold a baby that wasn't there, so the hands with the baby are an artifice.
Maybe that's what gave me the creeps. I may not know exactly WHY I got the creeps, but when I do I listen.
And that's why the group agreed to work off site and not publish, the material was being sent to where it was protected and expected to be useful. But there are some here who for their own purposes would throw us all to the wolves. Government protection? I wouldn't count on it, would you?
Yep, when the image is enlarged, one could see the transparent hand.
You can’t say that about the 0b0z0 presidency!
The extra wide part of Lolo’s pants is the pocket sticking out.
CONTINUATION OF #1047 FOR THE RECORD:
Helen Ibbitson Cook married Philip Caryl Jessup, Jr.
his father was Philip Caryl Jessup (1897-1986)
his grandfather was Rev. Henry Harris Jessup
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Jessup
http://www.asil.org/presidents/JessupPC.html
http://tinyurl.com/bry9hvh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Harris_Jessup
CONTINUATION:
THE FEARFUL MASTER - CHAPTER EIGHT
http://www.peacekey.com/1-1-a/UN_Web/1_UN_Book/The_Fearful_Master_09.htm
excerpt:
Philip Jessup: Philip Jessup is the man who represents the United States as one of the eleven justices on the United Nations World Court. His past is studded with affiliations with groups officially designated as Communist fronts. One of these, the Institute of Pacific Relations, has already been discussed. However, since Jessup was probably the most prominent and influential of all the leaders of this organization, it warrants recalling that the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee found that:
The IPR has been considered by the American Communists and by Soviet officials as an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and military intelligence. . . . A small core of officials and staff members carried the main burden of IPR activities and directed its administration and policies. Members of the small core of officials and staff members who controlled the IPR were either Communists or pro-Communists.
Jessup was chairman of the IPR American council from 1939 to 1940 and chairman of its Pacific council from 1939 to 1942. Both councils were high-level policy-making bodies.40
Jessup, both in and out of the IPR, was closely associated with Alger Hiss, Harry Dexter White, Frederick Vanderbilt Field and Lauchlin Currie. And, like Ralph Bunche, he came to the defense of Hiss as a character witness at Hiss’s trial.
When Frank Coe, secretary of the United Nations International Monetary Fund, testified before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in 1952, be inadvertently put Jessup in rather strange company. After readily answering questions about his associations with sundry individuals who had never been implicated in the Communist conspiracy, he suddenly found it necessary to invoke the Fifth Amendment when asked if he knew Philip Jessup.
Jessup served as assistant secretary-general of the UNRRA conference in 1943 and the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944. He was a member of the American delegation to the San Francisco conference in 1945. He was also the United States representative on the fifteen-man United Nations committee of jurists that had drafted the World Court statute. Continuing as a technical expert and advisor to various important UN commissions, Jessup prepared the State Department’s infamous “White Paper” on China. Written at the very time when the Communists were overrunning the mainland of China, this report lavishly praised the Reds and condemned the anti-Communist Nationalist forces. Jessup later became one of the early advocates for the admission of Red China to the United Nations...
Ms Cook’s parents divorced when she was 10. At the time she met Mr Obama, she was living in New York’s Upper East Side with her Australian mother, Helen Ibbitson, an art historian from a Melbourne banking family, and her US stepfather, Philip Jessup, general counsel for the National Gallery of Art in Washington...
Since Jan 3, 2009
Yeah. So?
I lurked a few months before I signed up. I’ve read all the long posts, posted once or twice on one of them. Don’t know how to research like y’all do, so I try to read and learn as much as I can on these threads. Don’t post much. Don’t shoot off at the mouth (via keyboard). Just tired of threads being ten times longer than they need to be, first by zerobot trolls and now by petty squabbling.
But, hey, go for it! Squabble away.
We can't jump to conclusions, there are many more images, but the above are clearly the same young man who has been presented as Lolo Soetoro, and the photographs are supposedly from his student days in Hawaii.
Yet, the SCANS of his identification photographs which we assume are from his passport, from his INS file, SHOW US THIS:
Although very poor quality images, why are we seeing a man who has a moustache and wears glasses?
Wasn't a focus really, after so many questionable images, we had given up trying to work it all out, but then, the image of the man on the horse came to light:
And that doesn't appear to be Lolo, but he does look more like the passport photo scans than Lolo does, right?
And if that's Maya, who was supposedly born in August 1970 iirc, she appears to be around two, so that photograph must have been taken in Hawaii? Very confusing...
I’ve just checked a number of your comments, you seem to spend most of your time telling freepers they are stupid.
What?!?
Check again.
Oh, yeah. To Zerobot trolls. They are stupid. So?
‘Indisputable proof’ of Obama forgery to be released
Tuesday, 17 July 2012 1:14:36 PM · 67 of 133
HoneysuckleTN to davetex
Pfft, whatever
Taking up bandwidth to type that? What a maroon!
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies
‘Indisputable proof’ of Obama forgery to be released
Tuesday, 17 July 2012 1:09:24 PM · 66 of 133
HoneysuckleTN to Homer_J_Simpson
If you think it’s BS, why click the thread, read the thread, then reply to the thread? Why waste your time? How stupid is that? LOL
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies
‘Indisputable proof’ of Obama forgery to be released
Tuesday, 17 July 2012 1:07:37 PM · 65 of 133
HoneysuckleTN to RIghtwardHo
Wow. You still posting on threads you think are silly? You have to read the thread title, click the thread, read what it’s about, then read other posts, then click reply, and type in that you think it’s silly?
How stupid is that? LOLOL
STRAIGHT FROM YOUR IN FORUM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.