Skip to comments.
Should Arizona secede?
Tenth Amendment Network ^
| 7/9/2012
| Marc Gindin
Posted on 07/09/2012 8:18:24 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentNetwork
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Manic_Episode
All 50 Governors need to form an alliance and fire fedzilla.
That'll work too.
21
posted on
07/09/2012 8:32:34 AM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: napscoordinator
I cant imagine how all these states think they could seceed when they take so much money from the Federal Government. Very few states would survive on their own.I think you're confusing AZ with Kalifornia, my FRiend.
AZ makes a lot more than it takes.
22
posted on
07/09/2012 8:32:36 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Soli Deo Gloria!)
To: moonshot925
Who was the Roberts in the 5-3 Texas v. White case?
23
posted on
07/09/2012 8:32:36 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
("As the light begins to fade in the city on the hill")
To: cripplecreek
It technically is landlocked, but I can easily think the Mexicans would give them access on the Colorado River to the Sea of Cortez...
To: RC2
Arizona cannot secede from the U.S. legally The actually is one way. The states could call for a Constitutional Convention, then pass an amendment allowing for secession.
Other than that, impossible. As someone once wrote, the Civil War made it "settled law" that states cannot secede from the Union as the Constitution stands now.
And for what it's worth, I'd love to see the states at least talk about calling for a Convention. Maybe that would scare the Fed's into respecting the 10th amendment.
25
posted on
07/09/2012 8:33:40 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: rovenstinez
It technically is landlocked, but I can easily think the Mexicans would give them access on the Colorado River to the Sea of Cortez...
You are aware that Mexico is on Obama's side?
26
posted on
07/09/2012 8:34:34 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: TenthAmendmentNetwork; napscoordinator
They also have the option of nullification.
As for the Federal tax situation, AZ is in the same boat as all the other states and that is they rely on FedGov-zilla to properly distribute tax monies that they (the States) have sent them. Few people realize that a portion of their local property taxes are sent to Washington to be redistributed by the DoEd (after they skim their “administrative costs”!)
The best route would be to tell FedGov-zilla to collect the taxes on their own as they would no longer forward any monies to them.
27
posted on
07/09/2012 8:34:52 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
To: Nowhere Man
“All 50 States should secede.”
####
No thanks.
I want NOTHING to do with Leftists.
NO conversation.
No “exchange of ideas”.
No cocktails.
And least of all, not even a single infectious germ contaminant, of their consummately destructive ideology.
28
posted on
07/09/2012 8:35:33 AM PDT
by
EyeGuy
(Armed, judgmental, fiscally responsible heterosexual.)
To: trotskylvalia
50 states should secede and send illegals to remaining 7 states. I know it's only Monday, but that could be post of the week.
29
posted on
07/09/2012 8:36:07 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: TenthAmendmentNetwork
In the parent/child relationship between the two ...
No. The U.S. is not the parent of its member states.
30
posted on
07/09/2012 8:37:14 AM PDT
by
Spirochete
(Sic transit gloria mundi)
To: TenthAmendmentNetwork
Should Arizona secede?If Obama is reelected, yes.
31
posted on
07/09/2012 8:40:54 AM PDT
by
umgud
(No Rats, No Rino's)
To: TenthAmendmentNetwork
The only way Obammy would let Arizona leave would be for it to join Mexico.
32
posted on
07/09/2012 8:44:42 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Leaning Right
Too late.
33
posted on
07/09/2012 8:45:21 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: napscoordinator
many states pay out $2 for every dollar they get back.
The money that comes in, in large goes to waste, such as welfare, or the well connected.
34
posted on
07/09/2012 8:46:12 AM PDT
by
MNDude
( Victimhood is the Holy Grail of liberalism)
To: TenthAmendmentNetwork
There is absolutely no reason for Arizona to even consider the thought of seceding. This is a distortion or contamination of perspective.
Arizona citizens and most citizens of the United States are conservative and form the core of what it means to be US citizens. Those of the left should be concerned they have separated into their own nation because they cannot live by the Constitution and traditional structures of the United States. It is not Arizona’s problem, it is the problem of people, many in gov’t, who don’t “fit” in a free and advanced society. It is the left who are on the path to seceding. Arizona is just fine and need do nothing but push back.
35
posted on
07/09/2012 8:46:24 AM PDT
by
iacovatx
(Conservatism is the political center--it is not on the "right")
To: cripplecreek
36
posted on
07/09/2012 8:46:29 AM PDT
by
cld51860
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: TenthAmendmentNetwork
If at first you don’t secede, try, try again...................
37
posted on
07/09/2012 8:46:43 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Think logically. Act normally.................)
To: All
The Union of the States never was a purely artificial and arbitrary relation. It began among the Colonies, and grew out of common origin, mutual sympathies, kindred principles, similar interests, and geographical relations. It was confirmed and strengthened by the necessities of war, and received definite form and character and sanction from the Articles of Confederation. By these, the Union was solemnly declared to 'be perpetual.' And when these Articles were found to be inadequate to the exigencies of the country, the Constitution was ordained 'to form a more perfect Union.' It is difficult to convey the idea of indissoluble unity more clearly than by these words. What can be indissoluble if a perpetual Union, made more perfect, is not?
To: RC2
The States can apply to the federal government for protection from invasion. When the federal government fails to provide this protection the states should sue for breach of contract and then secede from the union. The feds would have no ground to stand on in relation to the secession because they did not meet the requirements of the contract.
Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
39
posted on
07/09/2012 8:46:50 AM PDT
by
Ratman83
To: driftless2
You can't be serious. Read the constitution. All new states are brought into the union on the same basis as the older states.
They are sovereign
40
posted on
07/09/2012 8:48:45 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson